Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Glenw; I wish:
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 193959" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>I thought Jordan did just fine, given that it was his first extended time on the field against a good opponent. He fulfills the first requirement for a Tech QB; he can <em>run</em>. It would have been nice if he hadn't fumbled on the 8, but, with inexperienced QBs who come right off the bench, that is pretty much what you can expect. I think he'll start for us someday and may (hope not) start next weekend. Oh, and I hope people were watching when he threw the ball. No doubt about that arm; he had a harder time completing passes because he hasn't been working with the WRs. And, yes, I think we would have won the game if Tim had been in there. We really miss him at this stage of the season.</p><p></p><p>And I also think that we got some good evidence about OL performance yesterday. All of a sudden we were running the ball up the middle with authority, largely because MJ runs the midline better then JT. And, again all of a sudden, we rush for 314 yards and get the edge game working. With, I might point out, <em>exactly the same OL</em> that has given us problems (no use denying that) all year. If you run effectively up the center of the LOS, the O works. If you don't, it doesn't. That's why our missing BBs are so important. What if we had (why, why, oh merciful heaven, didn't we?) redshirted Laskey and he was playing BB this year? Imho, having that one piece in place would have meant 7 - 8 wins, even with all the injuries.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 193959, member: 265"] I thought Jordan did just fine, given that it was his first extended time on the field against a good opponent. He fulfills the first requirement for a Tech QB; he can [I]run[/I]. It would have been nice if he hadn't fumbled on the 8, but, with inexperienced QBs who come right off the bench, that is pretty much what you can expect. I think he'll start for us someday and may (hope not) start next weekend. Oh, and I hope people were watching when he threw the ball. No doubt about that arm; he had a harder time completing passes because he hasn't been working with the WRs. And, yes, I think we would have won the game if Tim had been in there. We really miss him at this stage of the season. And I also think that we got some good evidence about OL performance yesterday. All of a sudden we were running the ball up the middle with authority, largely because MJ runs the midline better then JT. And, again all of a sudden, we rush for 314 yards and get the edge game working. With, I might point out, [I]exactly the same OL[/I] that has given us problems (no use denying that) all year. If you run effectively up the center of the LOS, the O works. If you don't, it doesn't. That's why our missing BBs are so important. What if we had (why, why, oh merciful heaven, didn't we?) redshirted Laskey and he was playing BB this year? Imho, having that one piece in place would have meant 7 - 8 wins, even with all the injuries. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Glenw; I wish:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top