Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
General News about Key and his Staff
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="roadkill" data-source="post: 950552" data-attributes="member: 1555"><p>You both make good points. The implied accuracy of the fourth decimal place on a recruit’s rating likely exists only for relative comparison; I can’t imagine even the rating services take it that seriously. And I won’t revisit the many critiques of the rankings/rating systems that have been discussed on this board in the past. My take is that, with the exception of the relatively few “freaks” that have obvious star potential, individual rankings should be taken with a grain of salt and often have a large inaccuracy relative to actual performance. We probably offer most 3-stars only after a coach has had a chance to evaluate them personally and feels that they would be a good contributor.</p><p></p><p>That said, aggregate rankings that sum all the recruits in a given year or use a team blue chip ratio, tend to mitigate these individual inaccuracies and are more likely to be at least directionally useful for team comparisons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="roadkill, post: 950552, member: 1555"] You both make good points. The implied accuracy of the fourth decimal place on a recruit’s rating likely exists only for relative comparison; I can’t imagine even the rating services take it that seriously. And I won’t revisit the many critiques of the rankings/rating systems that have been discussed on this board in the past. My take is that, with the exception of the relatively few “freaks” that have obvious star potential, individual rankings should be taken with a grain of salt and often have a large inaccuracy relative to actual performance. We probably offer most 3-stars only after a coach has had a chance to evaluate them personally and feels that they would be a good contributor. That said, aggregate rankings that sum all the recruits in a given year or use a team blue chip ratio, tend to mitigate these individual inaccuracies and are more likely to be at least directionally useful for team comparisons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
General News about Key and his Staff
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top