Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Forbes Article on Stanford's Rise to Football Prominence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldJacketFan" data-source="post: 39364" data-attributes="member: 304"><p>Ain't that the truth. Let me post some numbers showing a particular coach's record in his first seven years.</p><p></p><p>The record of the unnamed coach in his first seven years was:</p><p></p><p>33-43-1</p><p></p><p>Lest anyone think he inherited a depleted, down program this program in the four years prior to his arrival went 32-13-1. In today's environment the unnamed coach would have hounded without mercy and, most likely, fired before his seventh year. </p><p></p><p>CPJ is 47-32 in his first six years at Tech, a considerable difference from the unnamed coach. To some this is unacceptable. Where would the Tech program be if the likes of Dwyer, Morgan and Burnett had remained for their senior years? Does anybody think Tech would have been 6-7? We all know success breeds success and had the '10 season would up a 9 or 10 win season it's arguable that the impact on recruiting would have been significant. I attach no blame to the 4 players mentioned, given the financial rewards it's tough to argue they made the wrong choice to go Pro. But I don't think that their decision impacted Tech not only on the field but in recruiting as well. We're seeing an upswing in recruiting and a coach/staff that is keeping the program at a consistent level. Compare that to so many other programs over the same period of time. I am not happy with 7-6 records but I see way too many positives to think about running CPJ off at this stage. Others will point out that CCG has a similar record but the one thing that turned me against CCG was the sense that he had maximized what his teams could accomplish and I've yet to get that same feeling with CPJ. </p><p></p><p>BTW does anyone care to guess who the unnamed coach is?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldJacketFan, post: 39364, member: 304"] Ain't that the truth. Let me post some numbers showing a particular coach's record in his first seven years. The record of the unnamed coach in his first seven years was: 33-43-1 Lest anyone think he inherited a depleted, down program this program in the four years prior to his arrival went 32-13-1. In today's environment the unnamed coach would have hounded without mercy and, most likely, fired before his seventh year. CPJ is 47-32 in his first six years at Tech, a considerable difference from the unnamed coach. To some this is unacceptable. Where would the Tech program be if the likes of Dwyer, Morgan and Burnett had remained for their senior years? Does anybody think Tech would have been 6-7? We all know success breeds success and had the '10 season would up a 9 or 10 win season it's arguable that the impact on recruiting would have been significant. I attach no blame to the 4 players mentioned, given the financial rewards it's tough to argue they made the wrong choice to go Pro. But I don't think that their decision impacted Tech not only on the field but in recruiting as well. We're seeing an upswing in recruiting and a coach/staff that is keeping the program at a consistent level. Compare that to so many other programs over the same period of time. I am not happy with 7-6 records but I see way too many positives to think about running CPJ off at this stage. Others will point out that CCG has a similar record but the one thing that turned me against CCG was the sense that he had maximized what his teams could accomplish and I've yet to get that same feeling with CPJ. BTW does anyone care to guess who the unnamed coach is? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Forbes Article on Stanford's Rise to Football Prominence
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top