Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
For the good of college football
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rfjeff9" data-source="post: 877270" data-attributes="member: 4174"><p>It isn't better for the sport for the same perennial powers to always be at the top. Case in point is current trend.</p><p></p><p>I think it is better for a change in overall winners each year to keep the overall fanbase for every school interested.</p><p></p><p>Put it like this. Are you more likely to watch more college football (outside of Tech games) if it's Bama, tOSU, Oklahoma, and UGA in the playoffs, or will you be more interested if finally someone else ales it in? Say BYU, UNC, Minnesota, and Baylor?</p><p></p><p>A top heavy outcome every season is killing cfb, IMHO. Same thing every year. Who will Bama beat for the natty? "YAWN!!!!!"</p><p></p><p>I would give much to see Wake break into the cabal and pull an upset for the ages. And it would make the entire following season more interesting.</p><p></p><p>In other words, not knowing who will come out on top makes it interesting. But every year, all anyone talks about anymore is Alabama. Not their fault, but I think it ultimately damages the sport.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rfjeff9, post: 877270, member: 4174"] It isn't better for the sport for the same perennial powers to always be at the top. Case in point is current trend. I think it is better for a change in overall winners each year to keep the overall fanbase for every school interested. Put it like this. Are you more likely to watch more college football (outside of Tech games) if it's Bama, tOSU, Oklahoma, and UGA in the playoffs, or will you be more interested if finally someone else ales it in? Say BYU, UNC, Minnesota, and Baylor? A top heavy outcome every season is killing cfb, IMHO. Same thing every year. Who will Bama beat for the natty? "YAWN!!!!!" I would give much to see Wake break into the cabal and pull an upset for the ages. And it would make the entire following season more interesting. In other words, not knowing who will come out on top makes it interesting. But every year, all anyone talks about anymore is Alabama. Not their fault, but I think it ultimately damages the sport. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
For the good of college football
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top