Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Fixes on O
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 423231" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Someone like longestday would need to break the play down because I'm not an expert. However I think 73 was assigned to the m lb on that play. He interrupted the m lb enough that he couldn't make a play on the QB. If the m lb had been lined up two yards further back, or if the m lb had taken a step backwards then 73 would have been more than 3 yards downfield to cover his assignment.</p><p></p><p>To understand if changes would be more tweeks or major changes I would need to see diagrams of both blocking responsibilities. If 73 is responsible for the m lb, this can't be a pass play because you can't be certain pre snap of the m lb will be within 3 yards or not. If 73 is given a different assignment to protect against being too far downfield then a running back or wr needs to pick him up in case the QB runs. That would mean you lose a receiver or an outside blocker.</p><p></p><p>Not trying to say your idea is bad, I would just need to see more details about how you would want the blocking scheme to work.</p><p></p><p>Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 423231, member: 2426"] Someone like longestday would need to break the play down because I'm not an expert. However I think 73 was assigned to the m lb on that play. He interrupted the m lb enough that he couldn't make a play on the QB. If the m lb had been lined up two yards further back, or if the m lb had taken a step backwards then 73 would have been more than 3 yards downfield to cover his assignment. To understand if changes would be more tweeks or major changes I would need to see diagrams of both blocking responsibilities. If 73 is responsible for the m lb, this can't be a pass play because you can't be certain pre snap of the m lb will be within 3 yards or not. If 73 is given a different assignment to protect against being too far downfield then a running back or wr needs to pick him up in case the QB runs. That would mean you lose a receiver or an outside blocker. Not trying to say your idea is bad, I would just need to see more details about how you would want the blocking scheme to work. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Fixes on O
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top