Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
First PPDvPwr5 Ranking
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="33jacket" data-source="post: 255443" data-attributes="member: 628"><p>thanks for insulting me. But I am pretty smart guy. For this big of an in-depth analysis on simply adding a column next to the teams with their win loss record I am wondering where the fundamental misunderstanding is? The original response to the original question could have been this simple:</p><p></p><p>the response could be no. or ok. it really is that easy. I don't need any explanation on why you don't include the win loss record next to the teams. Zero. I don't give a **** why you don't include it. I was just asking if you could since it would be interesting to see the records next to all these rankings...I think it would be a good view one can choose to correlate or not.</p><p></p><p>if you choose not to. Just say nah, I don't want to. Or nah I don't have the space. Ok...cool..thx for considering.</p><p></p><p>this reminds me of the explanations I get from the engineers that work for me always so interweaved and complicated...when all I was asking was just to consider, which is like ok or nah</p><p></p><p>this has gotten off topic. My lord. So is it yes or no? You won't add the w/l record next to it? thats fine...just was asking. For the record, good stats when considering multiple factors (o, d etc) will nicely correlate to win/loss. That is my guess....so it would be good to see over a year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="33jacket, post: 255443, member: 628"] thanks for insulting me. But I am pretty smart guy. For this big of an in-depth analysis on simply adding a column next to the teams with their win loss record I am wondering where the fundamental misunderstanding is? The original response to the original question could have been this simple: the response could be no. or ok. it really is that easy. I don't need any explanation on why you don't include the win loss record next to the teams. Zero. I don't give a **** why you don't include it. I was just asking if you could since it would be interesting to see the records next to all these rankings...I think it would be a good view one can choose to correlate or not. if you choose not to. Just say nah, I don't want to. Or nah I don't have the space. Ok...cool..thx for considering. this reminds me of the explanations I get from the engineers that work for me always so interweaved and complicated...when all I was asking was just to consider, which is like ok or nah this has gotten off topic. My lord. So is it yes or no? You won't add the w/l record next to it? thats fine...just was asking. For the record, good stats when considering multiple factors (o, d etc) will nicely correlate to win/loss. That is my guess....so it would be good to see over a year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
First PPDvPwr5 Ranking
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top