Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Film Study - GT Offense vs BC Defense.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTNavyNuke" data-source="post: 243054" data-attributes="member: 322"><p>[USER=639]@Boomergump[/USER] as I said yesterday, great post. After thinking about it more I have a hypothesis but no facts (so it's perfect for this board).</p><p></p><p>CPJ doesn't have a set play call list but goes off what the other team is doing and our strengths versus their weaknesses. It seems that even I have an idea of what type play is coming based on down and distance and point of the game. If someone were to chart that up, they could probably get a good indication of CPJ's response. Thus they show one D, CPJ makes the call and they shift or stunt into what they think CPJ has called. That's why they were showing so many D's. </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Do you think there is anything to being able to predict what CPJ is going to do on down & distance?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Were the formations / shifts they were showing in any logical progression to counter (sic) the earlier formations?</li> </ul><p></p><p>Let's also assume that every year the opposing ACC defensive coaches get together (led by Bud Foster and ....) to discuss what they have figured out about CPJ tendencies and tells from how certain players line up or go in motion. The enemy of my enemy is my ally. </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The two most successful plays it seems to me were the one where the BB goes in motion which was new and the passing being accurate on mid-range which didn't happen much when we tried last year. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">I think this game had the most tackle for losses of any game I can remember. They knew what we were going to do as you have eloquently pointed out. Were most of the TFLs scheme or blown assignments?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You said this was the best scheme CPJ has faced. Isn't that sort of expected as other teams "figure out" CPJ? I'm asking about scheme here and not players; Mercer could have the same scheme will not be able to execute at all. So I'd expect every year for the opposing ACC teams D scheme to get more effective.</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTNavyNuke, post: 243054, member: 322"] [USER=639]@Boomergump[/USER] as I said yesterday, great post. After thinking about it more I have a hypothesis but no facts (so it's perfect for this board). CPJ doesn't have a set play call list but goes off what the other team is doing and our strengths versus their weaknesses. It seems that even I have an idea of what type play is coming based on down and distance and point of the game. If someone were to chart that up, they could probably get a good indication of CPJ's response. Thus they show one D, CPJ makes the call and they shift or stunt into what they think CPJ has called. That's why they were showing so many D's. [LIST] [*]Do you think there is anything to being able to predict what CPJ is going to do on down & distance? [*]Were the formations / shifts they were showing in any logical progression to counter (sic) the earlier formations? [/LIST] Let's also assume that every year the opposing ACC defensive coaches get together (led by Bud Foster and ....) to discuss what they have figured out about CPJ tendencies and tells from how certain players line up or go in motion. The enemy of my enemy is my ally. [LIST] [*]The two most successful plays it seems to me were the one where the BB goes in motion which was new and the passing being accurate on mid-range which didn't happen much when we tried last year. [*]I think this game had the most tackle for losses of any game I can remember. They knew what we were going to do as you have eloquently pointed out. Were most of the TFLs scheme or blown assignments? [*]You said this was the best scheme CPJ has faced. Isn't that sort of expected as other teams "figure out" CPJ? I'm asking about scheme here and not players; Mercer could have the same scheme will not be able to execute at all. So I'd expect every year for the opposing ACC teams D scheme to get more effective. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Film Study - GT Offense vs BC Defense.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top