Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Early Non Conference Grades
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OG-T" data-source="post: 975244" data-attributes="member: 1741"><p>Grades through three games - and an exhibition, prior to this run of big conference games. </p><p>Coach Stoudamire/Staff: B- (said Offense ahead of Defense; first halves and last game make fans question Coach’s judgment).</p><p>Miles: C, yes, he had some strong halves, but consistency and reliability - and free throws! - he’s not instilling confidence yet. </p><p>Gapare: D-, and that’s kind. He has ton of skills and potential, but seems like a redshirt, why is he starting? Really poor decisions, especially on D. Hope he comes around. </p><p>Reeves: B+, he brings a lot of skill. Just a little more consistency and we’re good. Love his attitude. </p><p>Amare: C-, thought he could challenge for leading scorer; seems lost and what happened to shooting touch?</p><p>Claude: B+, some of his athleticism is below ACC level, but he seems like he will provide stats every game. Maybe uptick with conditioning. </p><p>Deebo: A, he looks leaner and quicker. Really pulling for him, and A for embracing role. </p><p>Sturdivant: B, he’s been solid, and prob deserves the start; he “runs” the team and nice Asst/TO ratio. Hopefully continues against bigger guards. </p><p>Sacko: B-, a little undersized for current role, but in just his first few college games, the potential is def there. Strong body. </p><p>Dowuona: C, not expecting offense, but offers skill others on active roster don’t have. </p><p>Murphy: C-, prob not enough on D to get on court. Will need to hit streaky 3s for time. </p><p>George/Souare: no grade. Unknown in real games. </p><p>Terry: TBD, expect he will contribute for sure. </p><p>Ndongo: TBD; concerned there is so much talk of him being a difference maker, but hopeful. Just hate to see undue pressure on kid who was not expected to be stat stuffer, but mentioned as will have impact when we get him back. Seems unfair to expectations. </p><p>Forrest: N/A currently. </p><p></p><p><strong>Agree with grades?</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OG-T, post: 975244, member: 1741"] Grades through three games - and an exhibition, prior to this run of big conference games. Coach Stoudamire/Staff: B- (said Offense ahead of Defense; first halves and last game make fans question Coach’s judgment). Miles: C, yes, he had some strong halves, but consistency and reliability - and free throws! - he’s not instilling confidence yet. Gapare: D-, and that’s kind. He has ton of skills and potential, but seems like a redshirt, why is he starting? Really poor decisions, especially on D. Hope he comes around. Reeves: B+, he brings a lot of skill. Just a little more consistency and we’re good. Love his attitude. Amare: C-, thought he could challenge for leading scorer; seems lost and what happened to shooting touch? Claude: B+, some of his athleticism is below ACC level, but he seems like he will provide stats every game. Maybe uptick with conditioning. Deebo: A, he looks leaner and quicker. Really pulling for him, and A for embracing role. Sturdivant: B, he’s been solid, and prob deserves the start; he “runs” the team and nice Asst/TO ratio. Hopefully continues against bigger guards. Sacko: B-, a little undersized for current role, but in just his first few college games, the potential is def there. Strong body. Dowuona: C, not expecting offense, but offers skill others on active roster don’t have. Murphy: C-, prob not enough on D to get on court. Will need to hit streaky 3s for time. George/Souare: no grade. Unknown in real games. Terry: TBD, expect he will contribute for sure. Ndongo: TBD; concerned there is so much talk of him being a difference maker, but hopeful. Just hate to see undue pressure on kid who was not expected to be stat stuffer, but mentioned as will have impact when we get him back. Seems unfair to expectations. Forrest: N/A currently. [B]Agree with grades?[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Early Non Conference Grades
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top