Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
#DUKEvsGT Postgame Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 763619" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>As usual, I waited for the box score. This reminded me a lot of our game with Pitt in 2014. I said at the time that Cryst must have thought Tech had a voodon on our sidelines; every time they looked like they were going to get back into it, they would either have a penalty or a turnover. Cutliffe must have felt the same way yesterday. They gave us the football game. </p><p></p><p>But … plenty of times that happens and the other team can't take it away. Tech did and looked pretty good doing so. </p><p></p><p>The Good:</p><p></p><p>• Losing Gibbs looked like it would be very bad news, then Mason came in, got 21 carries and, just like clockwork, delivered 105 yards rushing. He's nothing if not dependable. This is even more remarkable since Duke had - wait for it - <em>10</em> TFLs. That has <em>got</em> to stop. </p><p></p><p>• Someone taught Stewart to get his kicks up! For whoever that was, thankyou,thankyou,thankyou,thankyou,thankyou.</p><p></p><p>• Sims was under a pretty good rush and responded well. He ran the ball effectively too. <em>Why</em> doesn't he get a chance to do that more often? On purpose, I mean.</p><p></p><p>• We looked well coached when it counted. There was a good amount of sloppy play, but we have been idle for a month. That we responded to opportunities like we did is a credit to the coaches as well as the players.</p><p></p><p>• Kent did a good job kicking. Not having Harvin out there made a difference, but not as much as it could have. Good job, young man!</p><p></p><p>• Our run D was the best this year. With some of the injured troops back next year, we could be a lot better there.</p><p></p><p>The Bad:</p><p></p><p>• I believe I mentioned <em>10 TFLs! </em>I mean, I know we haven't played in a month, but that just has to stop by next Saturday. </p><p></p><p>• The DBs got relentlessly victimized. Admittedly, Brice is a pretty good QB, but <em>really</em>. (Btw, he throws too hard; George Mira (that dates me) had the same problem.) </p><p></p><p>• And that's about it. Hard to find major fault when you win convincingly after laying off for a month.</p><p></p><p>•</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 763619, member: 265"] As usual, I waited for the box score. This reminded me a lot of our game with Pitt in 2014. I said at the time that Cryst must have thought Tech had a voodon on our sidelines; every time they looked like they were going to get back into it, they would either have a penalty or a turnover. Cutliffe must have felt the same way yesterday. They gave us the football game. But … plenty of times that happens and the other team can't take it away. Tech did and looked pretty good doing so. The Good: • Losing Gibbs looked like it would be very bad news, then Mason came in, got 21 carries and, just like clockwork, delivered 105 yards rushing. He's nothing if not dependable. This is even more remarkable since Duke had - wait for it - [I]10[/I] TFLs. That has [I]got[/I] to stop. • Someone taught Stewart to get his kicks up! For whoever that was, thankyou,thankyou,thankyou,thankyou,thankyou. • Sims was under a pretty good rush and responded well. He ran the ball effectively too. [I]Why[/I] doesn't he get a chance to do that more often? On purpose, I mean. • We looked well coached when it counted. There was a good amount of sloppy play, but we have been idle for a month. That we responded to opportunities like we did is a credit to the coaches as well as the players. • Kent did a good job kicking. Not having Harvin out there made a difference, but not as much as it could have. Good job, young man! • Our run D was the best this year. With some of the injured troops back next year, we could be a lot better there. The Bad: • I believe I mentioned [I]10 TFLs! [/I]I mean, I know we haven't played in a month, but that just has to stop by next Saturday. • The DBs got relentlessly victimized. Admittedly, Brice is a pretty good QB, but [I]really[/I]. (Btw, he throws too hard; George Mira (that dates me) had the same problem.) • And that's about it. Hard to find major fault when you win convincingly after laying off for a month. • [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
#DUKEvsGT Postgame Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top