Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
David Hale's ACC Position Group Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CuseJacket" data-source="post: 440525" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>I'll offer this once because I don't like repeating negatives... I disagree. Our secondary has me terrified. But the feeling is mainly due to lack of experience.</p><p></p><p>I agree our recruiting has improved and we are seemingly more athletic. Maybe this is nitpicking language, but how do you leap to "great" with Tre Swill and Lamont? How are Oliver and Bonds, who didn't make the 2-deep last year, nor did Bonds make this year's preseason depth chart, "studs"? Keep in mind none of this year's secondary was able to unseat our good, not great starting senior DBs last year. Expectation should be a regression, particularly at the start of the year.</p><p></p><p>Simmons, the lone DB who has gotten enough meaningful time, needs to show me something. He has not demonstrated consistent ball skills and hasn't proven himself to be one who likes to put his neck in there and come down hard in run support. I felt like there were a few business decisions last year, which is troubling for someone who was a back-up. Perhaps that was coaching, I don't know. In any case, he can improve like anyone.</p><p></p><p>There are ways we can make our DBs look better e.g., perhaps Woody can find pressure with the front 7, so the DBs don't have to work as long. In any case, I hope the DBs blow my expectations out of the water. I am looking forward to seeing them all perform. There is a lot of potential there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CuseJacket, post: 440525, member: 274"] I'll offer this once because I don't like repeating negatives... I disagree. Our secondary has me terrified. But the feeling is mainly due to lack of experience. I agree our recruiting has improved and we are seemingly more athletic. Maybe this is nitpicking language, but how do you leap to "great" with Tre Swill and Lamont? How are Oliver and Bonds, who didn't make the 2-deep last year, nor did Bonds make this year's preseason depth chart, "studs"? Keep in mind none of this year's secondary was able to unseat our good, not great starting senior DBs last year. Expectation should be a regression, particularly at the start of the year. Simmons, the lone DB who has gotten enough meaningful time, needs to show me something. He has not demonstrated consistent ball skills and hasn't proven himself to be one who likes to put his neck in there and come down hard in run support. I felt like there were a few business decisions last year, which is troubling for someone who was a back-up. Perhaps that was coaching, I don't know. In any case, he can improve like anyone. There are ways we can make our DBs look better e.g., perhaps Woody can find pressure with the front 7, so the DBs don't have to work as long. In any case, I hope the DBs blow my expectations out of the water. I am looking forward to seeing them all perform. There is a lot of potential there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
David Hale's ACC Position Group Rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top