Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
David Hale's ACC Position Group Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="redmule" data-source="post: 440173" data-attributes="member: 1338"><p>We play numbers 1,2,6,8,9,10,11, and 13 on that list. We are #12. Clemson will be tough no doubt. Let's hope Miami is overrated in this list. Other than those two, it would seem we are somewhat competitive with the rest of our games., ie 6,8,9,10,11,13. With three #14 ratings, being an optimist, there is nowhere but up for receivers, DL, and ST. In other words, the difference between winning 5-6 games and 8-9 games will be what it always is - timely turnovers or penalties, a 4th down conversion, injuries, catching a team on the down slope versus when they are hot. Winning 10 or more requires several breaks. Just like always.</p><p></p><p>If we take these rankings at face value, some good news is the Atlantic being tougher. VT will have a tough cross over game on their hands with BC. Same with Duke/Wake and UNC/NCSU. If we take care of business in the Coastal, the Clemson game will not be as important as in years past. Louisville hasn't seen the TO, and their defensive ratings suck. Not playing UVA on the road and playing uga on the road is almost a guarantee of one less loss.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="redmule, post: 440173, member: 1338"] We play numbers 1,2,6,8,9,10,11, and 13 on that list. We are #12. Clemson will be tough no doubt. Let's hope Miami is overrated in this list. Other than those two, it would seem we are somewhat competitive with the rest of our games., ie 6,8,9,10,11,13. With three #14 ratings, being an optimist, there is nowhere but up for receivers, DL, and ST. In other words, the difference between winning 5-6 games and 8-9 games will be what it always is - timely turnovers or penalties, a 4th down conversion, injuries, catching a team on the down slope versus when they are hot. Winning 10 or more requires several breaks. Just like always. If we take these rankings at face value, some good news is the Atlantic being tougher. VT will have a tough cross over game on their hands with BC. Same with Duke/Wake and UNC/NCSU. If we take care of business in the Coastal, the Clemson game will not be as important as in years past. Louisville hasn't seen the TO, and their defensive ratings suck. Not playing UVA on the road and playing uga on the road is almost a guarantee of one less loss. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
David Hale's ACC Position Group Rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top