Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
David Hale's ACC Position Group Rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CuseJacket" data-source="post: 439842" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>This should generate some chatter.</p><p></p><p><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DiKuhTWWkAEH-I2.jpg:large" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>He offered an explanation on most position groups on Facebook.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/1236229176429997/posts/2007150089337898/" target="_blank">In his wrap-up post he says</a>:</p><p>"Some additional thoughts on our position rankings...</p><p></p><p>See the graph below for how each team fared. This is hardly an accurate way to predict finish, as certainly some categories mean a lot more than others, and many teams will find answers where holes seem to exist today. Still, it's relatively reflective of how I'd actually stack up the league for the most part -- a clear top 4, a few bottom feeders, and a pretty close mix among the rest.</p><p></p><p>A few things that did jump out to me here...</p><p></p><p>1.) Clemson was ranked in the top 4 in every category. That goes to show why they belong as the heavy favorite.</p><p></p><p>2.) Virginia Tech is WAY down there. That's a function of a lot of holes to fill, but is also probably undervaluing the overall talent level, not to mention the coaching staff. They're not that bad.</p><p></p><p>3.) Similarly, the team ranked way higher than I expected is UNC. Have I potentially overlooked some of what's been built while they dealt with so many injuries last year?</p><p></p><p>4.) The only teams that didn't place any unit in the top 4 are UVA, Pitt and Georgia Tech. That sounds about right to me, too. All 3 have a few units that are solid, and GT and Pitt in particular aren't going to be brutal at many spots, but there's not a ton of elite there right now.</p><p></p><p>5.) Conversely, the only teams that didn't rank in the bottom anywhere were Clemson and Miami... for good reason. Though it's worth noting, NC State only slipped there in Special Teams."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CuseJacket, post: 439842, member: 274"] This should generate some chatter. [IMG]https://syracusefan.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FDiKuhTWWkAEH-I2.jpg%3Alarge&hash=46f8bf4b251d8e1a750d3efc8f757fdf[/IMG] He offered an explanation on most position groups on Facebook. [URL='https://www.facebook.com/1236229176429997/posts/2007150089337898/']In his wrap-up post he says[/URL]: "Some additional thoughts on our position rankings... See the graph below for how each team fared. This is hardly an accurate way to predict finish, as certainly some categories mean a lot more than others, and many teams will find answers where holes seem to exist today. Still, it's relatively reflective of how I'd actually stack up the league for the most part -- a clear top 4, a few bottom feeders, and a pretty close mix among the rest. A few things that did jump out to me here... 1.) Clemson was ranked in the top 4 in every category. That goes to show why they belong as the heavy favorite. 2.) Virginia Tech is WAY down there. That's a function of a lot of holes to fill, but is also probably undervaluing the overall talent level, not to mention the coaching staff. They're not that bad. 3.) Similarly, the team ranked way higher than I expected is UNC. Have I potentially overlooked some of what's been built while they dealt with so many injuries last year? 4.) The only teams that didn't place any unit in the top 4 are UVA, Pitt and Georgia Tech. That sounds about right to me, too. All 3 have a few units that are solid, and GT and Pitt in particular aren't going to be brutal at many spots, but there's not a ton of elite there right now. 5.) Conversely, the only teams that didn't rank in the bottom anywhere were Clemson and Miami... for good reason. Though it's worth noting, NC State only slipped there in Special Teams." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
David Hale's ACC Position Group Rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top