Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dave Patenaude's Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BCJacket" data-source="post: 686474" data-attributes="member: 2332"><p>Just my humble poorly informed opinion.</p><p></p><p>But I feel like most of the criticism of CDP is comparing him to an imaginary alternate with different conditions.</p><p></p><p>It would be fair if someone said "_____ worked well, I don't know why we got away from that." I don't hear much of that. </p><p></p><p>I hear a lot of "What we did didn't work. We should have done 'this and this' [with a better O-line and a different quarterback.]"</p><p></p><p>To my recollection we saw CDP try a hybrid run option with TO-didn't really work; pass spread with LJ -ugly; and finally more of the spread offense with JG -probably practicing what we'll be running in the future (once a losing season was forgone).</p><p></p><p>For everyone who says we should have played more to our personnel with read option, etc. Did you watch the USF, Citadel and Temple games? He tried it, didn't work.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure what else CDP was supposed to have tried that could have worked better <u>given the real conditions</u> he had to work with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BCJacket, post: 686474, member: 2332"] Just my humble poorly informed opinion. But I feel like most of the criticism of CDP is comparing him to an imaginary alternate with different conditions. It would be fair if someone said "_____ worked well, I don't know why we got away from that." I don't hear much of that. I hear a lot of "What we did didn't work. We should have done 'this and this' [with a better O-line and a different quarterback.]" To my recollection we saw CDP try a hybrid run option with TO-didn't really work; pass spread with LJ -ugly; and finally more of the spread offense with JG -probably practicing what we'll be running in the future (once a losing season was forgone). For everyone who says we should have played more to our personnel with read option, etc. Did you watch the USF, Citadel and Temple games? He tried it, didn't work. I'm not sure what else CDP was supposed to have tried that could have worked better [U]given the real conditions[/U] he had to work with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dave Patenaude's Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top