Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dave Patenaude's Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InsideLB" data-source="post: 675498" data-attributes="member: 857"><p>I struggled to eval the OC this year.</p><p></p><p>The OL was thin to begin with then lost its two most experienced guys for the season, plus the only OL who played well vs Clemson.</p><p></p><p>Whoever won QB starter got to be a rookie behind that OL. Yay. Oh wait, all of the above also have to transition to a NEW offense for which they were not recruited.</p><p></p><p>Simple, you say. Run more option stuff. But then you aren't really transitioning, are you? And as a matter of fact we did incorporate some option.</p><p></p><p>OC was criticized for giving 3 different QBs playing time and not sticking with one guy. However can you imagine how hard the fonts here would be crying for the back ups if they hadn't seen them? They would say he should at least TRY the back ups and see who gave him the best chance to win....which is what he actually did.</p><p></p><p>I see criticism the OC did not adjust. Yet in many games we moved the ball much better in the second half.</p><p></p><p>Look, I don't know if DP is a good OC or not. I do know we were picked to go 3-8 and last in Coastal on the basis of the transition plus big problems with the trenches on both sides of the ball.</p><p></p><p>Just funny to see the expert keyboard warrior critics here who through their years of football experience KNOW that DP is not the man because the O as expected by actual football experts struggled.</p><p></p><p>You may ultimately be right. But I guarandamntee it won't be because you can see it now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InsideLB, post: 675498, member: 857"] I struggled to eval the OC this year. The OL was thin to begin with then lost its two most experienced guys for the season, plus the only OL who played well vs Clemson. Whoever won QB starter got to be a rookie behind that OL. Yay. Oh wait, all of the above also have to transition to a NEW offense for which they were not recruited. Simple, you say. Run more option stuff. But then you aren't really transitioning, are you? And as a matter of fact we did incorporate some option. OC was criticized for giving 3 different QBs playing time and not sticking with one guy. However can you imagine how hard the fonts here would be crying for the back ups if they hadn't seen them? They would say he should at least TRY the back ups and see who gave him the best chance to win....which is what he actually did. I see criticism the OC did not adjust. Yet in many games we moved the ball much better in the second half. Look, I don't know if DP is a good OC or not. I do know we were picked to go 3-8 and last in Coastal on the basis of the transition plus big problems with the trenches on both sides of the ball. Just funny to see the expert keyboard warrior critics here who through their years of football experience KNOW that DP is not the man because the O as expected by actual football experts struggled. You may ultimately be right. But I guarandamntee it won't be because you can see it now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dave Patenaude's Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top