Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference reputation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bruce Wayne" data-source="post: 279791" data-attributes="member: 231"><p>I agree with you again [USER=2566]@WreckedbyWhiskey[/USER]. I think the competing visions primarily exist among fans since I think the Institute has shown in its deeds a consistent vision for its athletic programs going back decades. I did suggest that I think the most significant ways to become a national contender are unethical actions but didn't say by whom. Certainly coaches (oversigning, running kids off, grayshirting and dishonest medical scholarships, etc.) but also things fans do or boosters. </p><p></p><p>In my view, the Tech fans who most want to see Tech compete in a manner that is sustainable the way a factory can could just go ahead and emulate what those other teams boosters and fans do. Not all of that actually has to be shady. Simply raising as much money for the athletic program as one can, above board, is useful for helping improve the program. For example, in hiring slews of NCAA legal pseudo-assistants that aid in recruiting.</p><p></p><p>In conclusion I do agree with you that an ethical program can exist at an honorable institution of higher education that does have consistent and regular success. I think CPJ and Tech has shown this at a number of points in its history. This is not on the level of the Bama's and Clemsons, but it ain't chopped liver either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bruce Wayne, post: 279791, member: 231"] I agree with you again [USER=2566]@WreckedbyWhiskey[/USER]. I think the competing visions primarily exist among fans since I think the Institute has shown in its deeds a consistent vision for its athletic programs going back decades. I did suggest that I think the most significant ways to become a national contender are unethical actions but didn't say by whom. Certainly coaches (oversigning, running kids off, grayshirting and dishonest medical scholarships, etc.) but also things fans do or boosters. In my view, the Tech fans who most want to see Tech compete in a manner that is sustainable the way a factory can could just go ahead and emulate what those other teams boosters and fans do. Not all of that actually has to be shady. Simply raising as much money for the athletic program as one can, above board, is useful for helping improve the program. For example, in hiring slews of NCAA legal pseudo-assistants that aid in recruiting. In conclusion I do agree with you that an ethical program can exist at an honorable institution of higher education that does have consistent and regular success. I think CPJ and Tech has shown this at a number of points in its history. This is not on the level of the Bama's and Clemsons, but it ain't chopped liver either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference reputation?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top