Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 999716" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Words matter. "Attempt" to purchase didn't indicate that it would be successful. Remember, this is in response to FSU calling this a "penalty". The ACC is pointing out that it is a property ownership and commercial transaction instead of a "penalty". They are not giving any indication of what the response to any "attempt" would be. They are simply pointing out that the GOR is not legally part of the ACC withdrawal process and is not a withdrawal fee.</p><p></p><p>You use hyperbolic language regarding negotiating for the sale of the rights back to FSU. Has anyone indicated that the ACC would "immediately shut down any attempts", or is that your attempt to make is an emotional discussion instead of a logical discussion?</p><p></p><p>I encourage you to actually read the FSU complaint and this ACC response for yourself. You will see that the FSU complaint is filled with emotionally charged words like you are using. The ACC response is filled with references to the language in the contracts, the definitions of those words and phrases that are defined in the contract, and the application of laws related to those contacts and FSU's complaint. I said before that lawsuit are won based on laws and court precedents as they relate to the transactions and contacts. Lawsuits are not win by shouting the loudest. So far, FSU is shouting a lot, but hasn't made many, if any, compelling logical legal arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 999716, member: 2426"] Words matter. "Attempt" to purchase didn't indicate that it would be successful. Remember, this is in response to FSU calling this a "penalty". The ACC is pointing out that it is a property ownership and commercial transaction instead of a "penalty". They are not giving any indication of what the response to any "attempt" would be. They are simply pointing out that the GOR is not legally part of the ACC withdrawal process and is not a withdrawal fee. You use hyperbolic language regarding negotiating for the sale of the rights back to FSU. Has anyone indicated that the ACC would "immediately shut down any attempts", or is that your attempt to make is an emotional discussion instead of a logical discussion? I encourage you to actually read the FSU complaint and this ACC response for yourself. You will see that the FSU complaint is filled with emotionally charged words like you are using. The ACC response is filled with references to the language in the contracts, the definitions of those words and phrases that are defined in the contract, and the application of laws related to those contacts and FSU's complaint. I said before that lawsuit are won based on laws and court precedents as they relate to the transactions and contacts. Lawsuits are not win by shouting the loudest. So far, FSU is shouting a lot, but hasn't made many, if any, compelling logical legal arguments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top