Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 999615" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>This ACC filing also points out other contradictions. a) FSU claims that the contracts are invalid and should be dismissed by the court. and b) FSU continues to collect payouts from the contracts. Also a) FSU is asking to have their notice to withdraw from the ACC entered retroactively. while b) FSU is stating that they have not withdrawn from the ACC and b) Is still acting as a member and participating in ACC management meetings and voting on ACC matters.</p><p></p><p>The second one appears to have a hard issue to solve. I don't know of any legal way a court could backdate a document filing, but IF they do FSU is exerting influence on ACC matters during this year. There is no way that a court can extract the influence. The court would be engaging in time travel to backdate the withdrawal notice, and would not have the ability to wipe out all in-conference activities that FSU has engaged in during this year.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: Another contradiction in FSU's filings, but not part of the ACC answer. a) FSU's media rights are much more valuable than any other member of the ACC. and b) The value that FSU should pay for the return of their media rights is the average value of the ACC media payouts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 999615, member: 2426"] This ACC filing also points out other contradictions. a) FSU claims that the contracts are invalid and should be dismissed by the court. and b) FSU continues to collect payouts from the contracts. Also a) FSU is asking to have their notice to withdraw from the ACC entered retroactively. while b) FSU is stating that they have not withdrawn from the ACC and b) Is still acting as a member and participating in ACC management meetings and voting on ACC matters. The second one appears to have a hard issue to solve. I don't know of any legal way a court could backdate a document filing, but IF they do FSU is exerting influence on ACC matters during this year. There is no way that a court can extract the influence. The court would be engaging in time travel to backdate the withdrawal notice, and would not have the ability to wipe out all in-conference activities that FSU has engaged in during this year. EDIT: Another contradiction in FSU's filings, but not part of the ACC answer. a) FSU's media rights are much more valuable than any other member of the ACC. and b) The value that FSU should pay for the return of their media rights is the average value of the ACC media payouts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top