Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RamblinRed" data-source="post: 959206" data-attributes="member: 1776"><p>An interesting note out of Dallas this weekend.</p><p>While SMU has agreed to give up Tier 1 media payouts for 9 years, its expectation is that the revenue it will receive from the other revenue pieces (Tier 2-3, NCAAT units, playoff revenue distribution, etc.) will allow it to make at least as much, if not more, than it currently makes in the AAC.</p><p></p><p>It makes their calculation make alot more sense. Yes we are getting similar to what we get today, but at least we are in a P4 conference now and set up much better for the future.</p><p></p><p>Even makes more sense for Stanford/Cal.</p><p>They are giving up roughly $16M per year (assuming ACC tier 1 share right now is approx $24M), but that would still mean they are getting everything else - which could amount to over $20M per year.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=twitter]1697639735605481840[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>Obviously it is alot less than their payout from the PAC - Which I believe was about $37M last year, but likely more than they would have gotten if they had to join the Mountain West or had to try to rebuild a new PAC.</p><p></p><p>There was also a new Ross Dellinger article talking about how the ACC expansion came about. From that article is sounds like the additional revenue from the new members coming in at discount rates is going to be split close to 50/50 between equal payouts to all current members and money going into a performance based pot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RamblinRed, post: 959206, member: 1776"] An interesting note out of Dallas this weekend. While SMU has agreed to give up Tier 1 media payouts for 9 years, its expectation is that the revenue it will receive from the other revenue pieces (Tier 2-3, NCAAT units, playoff revenue distribution, etc.) will allow it to make at least as much, if not more, than it currently makes in the AAC. It makes their calculation make alot more sense. Yes we are getting similar to what we get today, but at least we are in a P4 conference now and set up much better for the future. Even makes more sense for Stanford/Cal. They are giving up roughly $16M per year (assuming ACC tier 1 share right now is approx $24M), but that would still mean they are getting everything else - which could amount to over $20M per year. [MEDIA=twitter]1697639735605481840[/MEDIA] Obviously it is alot less than their payout from the PAC - Which I believe was about $37M last year, but likely more than they would have gotten if they had to join the Mountain West or had to try to rebuild a new PAC. There was also a new Ross Dellinger article talking about how the ACC expansion came about. From that article is sounds like the additional revenue from the new members coming in at discount rates is going to be split close to 50/50 between equal payouts to all current members and money going into a performance based pot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top