Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThatGuy" data-source="post: 955849" data-attributes="member: 3440"><p>For those who didn't click through, the article is worth a read.</p><p></p><p>In particular, 2 things:</p><p></p><p>1 - the pro rata clause with ESPN only covers ESPN - not the ACC Network.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>2 - It posits that Stanford could potentially afford, like SMU, to forego revenue distributions for some time period. Cal couldn't, which would mean it would need to be cut in for at least a partial share. So it proposes the conference might see $60MM in new revenue.</p><p></p><p>So what happens then? That's the sticking point. The idea is that some will be distributed to conference members to offset travel costs. But for the rest? You guessed it. Clemson and FSU are demanding they get higher shares than the rest of the conference.</p><p></p><p>It also paints the picture that we're dealing with days, not weeks, here. Worth a read. </p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://sports.yahoo.com/could-george-w-bush-and-condi-rice-help-push-acc-to-expansion-heres-why-some-member-schools-are-unhappy-224245252.html[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThatGuy, post: 955849, member: 3440"] For those who didn't click through, the article is worth a read. In particular, 2 things: 1 - the pro rata clause with ESPN only covers ESPN - not the ACC Network. 2 - It posits that Stanford could potentially afford, like SMU, to forego revenue distributions for some time period. Cal couldn't, which would mean it would need to be cut in for at least a partial share. So it proposes the conference might see $60MM in new revenue. So what happens then? That's the sticking point. The idea is that some will be distributed to conference members to offset travel costs. But for the rest? You guessed it. Clemson and FSU are demanding they get higher shares than the rest of the conference. It also paints the picture that we're dealing with days, not weeks, here. Worth a read. [URL unfurl="true"]https://sports.yahoo.com/could-george-w-bush-and-condi-rice-help-push-acc-to-expansion-heres-why-some-member-schools-are-unhappy-224245252.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top