Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RamblinRed" data-source="post: 953967" data-attributes="member: 1776"><p>I think this is all relatively simple to understand.</p><p></p><p>B1G wasn't really looking to expand any more, but the Colorado move has sort of shook things up.</p><p>They aren't looking at the AZ schools because either the AZ schools are going to go to the B12 - effectively killing the PAC or they will stay with the PAC, keeping it alive. They don't being enough to garner a full B1G share, so they are not going to go after them, but if they decide to jump to the B12 along with the other 4 corner schools then B1G will pick over the pieces of the PAC once it is effectively dead and take a few of the best pieces they have left at a discount.</p><p></p><p>FWIW, from one article I read USC is strongly against any more PAC schools joining the B10, while UCLA is indifferent. </p><p></p><p>Everything comes down to a decision by the AZ schools. Do they stay or do they jump. If they stay then B1G does not offer WA and OR. What would be interesting is what happens if the AZ schools split in their decisions. Article I read said Az St was prepared to remain with the PAC. What if AZ jumped, but AZ St did not. (and assume Utah also stays at that point as B12 would be at 14 teams). If only 1 of the schools jumps, would that leave enough that the B1G would pass on WA and OR again as the PAC would have 8 teams and could pretty easily add a couple more if they wanted to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RamblinRed, post: 953967, member: 1776"] I think this is all relatively simple to understand. B1G wasn't really looking to expand any more, but the Colorado move has sort of shook things up. They aren't looking at the AZ schools because either the AZ schools are going to go to the B12 - effectively killing the PAC or they will stay with the PAC, keeping it alive. They don't being enough to garner a full B1G share, so they are not going to go after them, but if they decide to jump to the B12 along with the other 4 corner schools then B1G will pick over the pieces of the PAC once it is effectively dead and take a few of the best pieces they have left at a discount. FWIW, from one article I read USC is strongly against any more PAC schools joining the B10, while UCLA is indifferent. Everything comes down to a decision by the AZ schools. Do they stay or do they jump. If they stay then B1G does not offer WA and OR. What would be interesting is what happens if the AZ schools split in their decisions. Article I read said Az St was prepared to remain with the PAC. What if AZ jumped, but AZ St did not. (and assume Utah also stays at that point as B12 would be at 14 teams). If only 1 of the schools jumps, would that leave enough that the B1G would pass on WA and OR again as the PAC would have 8 teams and could pretty easily add a couple more if they wanted to. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top