Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 883933" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>Here's last year's F+ ratings: <a href="https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fplus/2021" target="_blank">https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fplus/2021</a>. It's easier to read at Fremeau's personal site <a href="https://www.bcftoys.com/2021-fei/" target="_blank">https://www.bcftoys.com/2021-fei/</a>.</p><p></p><p>It's not perfect, but it should give us a ballpark of where last year's ACC teams would line up against SEC teams (and it was a bad year for the ACC, with Clemson being "down").</p><p></p><p>Notre Dame was #6, in the ballpark of UGA, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, etc.</p><p></p><p>Wake was #22, NCST was #23, Pitt was #25, and Clemson was #26. They were looking up to Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Auburn, but close and competitive. They're ahead of Florida, Miss St, LSU, and a lot of other good teams. </p><p></p><p>Miami was #56, UNC was #59, UVA was #65, Syracuse was #72, and VT was #74. That's going to put you a good bit ahead of South Carolina, Missouri, and Vandy in the SEC. They'd be looking up at LSU, but capable of competing. </p><p></p><p>GT was #97 (better than Vandy, for example). </p><p></p><p>UNC and UVA probably wouldn't have had banner years in the SEC last year, but a number of teams in the ACC would have been competing at the top of the conference (but behind UGA and Alabama, who were ahead of EVERYBODY).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 883933, member: 282"] Here's last year's F+ ratings: [URL]https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fplus/2021[/URL]. It's easier to read at Fremeau's personal site [URL]https://www.bcftoys.com/2021-fei/[/URL]. It's not perfect, but it should give us a ballpark of where last year's ACC teams would line up against SEC teams (and it was a bad year for the ACC, with Clemson being "down"). Notre Dame was #6, in the ballpark of UGA, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, etc. Wake was #22, NCST was #23, Pitt was #25, and Clemson was #26. They were looking up to Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Auburn, but close and competitive. They're ahead of Florida, Miss St, LSU, and a lot of other good teams. Miami was #56, UNC was #59, UVA was #65, Syracuse was #72, and VT was #74. That's going to put you a good bit ahead of South Carolina, Missouri, and Vandy in the SEC. They'd be looking up at LSU, but capable of competing. GT was #97 (better than Vandy, for example). UNC and UVA probably wouldn't have had banner years in the SEC last year, but a number of teams in the ACC would have been competing at the top of the conference (but behind UGA and Alabama, who were ahead of EVERYBODY). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top