Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CEB" data-source="post: 883446" data-attributes="member: 4905"><p>No... each team in the BIG is making $50M and the value of the new deal with USC and UCLA is $70M to all, so that’s $70M for new members plus $20M each to existing members.</p><p>Big round numbers and assumptions here- no knowledge of what the BIG deal Actually pays...</p><p></p><p>Yes, we can presume that the existing value of the conference has increased some amount based upon the fact that the deal is being renegotiated, but if the existing BIG is bringing in new teams you have to believe those new teams carry their own weight in terms of value PLUS the incremental increase to the other 14 existing teams... whatever that increase is. If you could get the increase without them, why incur the additional scheduling issues and logistics of adding more teams? And if all they add is their own value with no incremental increase to other members, again, no reason to bring them on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CEB, post: 883446, member: 4905"] No... each team in the BIG is making $50M and the value of the new deal with USC and UCLA is $70M to all, so that’s $70M for new members plus $20M each to existing members. Big round numbers and assumptions here- no knowledge of what the BIG deal Actually pays... Yes, we can presume that the existing value of the conference has increased some amount based upon the fact that the deal is being renegotiated, but if the existing BIG is bringing in new teams you have to believe those new teams carry their own weight in terms of value PLUS the incremental increase to the other 14 existing teams... whatever that increase is. If you could get the increase without them, why incur the additional scheduling issues and logistics of adding more teams? And if all they add is their own value with no incremental increase to other members, again, no reason to bring them on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top