Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CEB" data-source="post: 882561" data-attributes="member: 4905"><p>You’re absolutely right... there is most definitely a point of diminishing return. At some point there are no teams left that move the needle. And it’s not just $80M in your arbitrary example... it’s $80M plus what ever increment per existing team to bring them up to $80M also. </p><p>Honestly, I don’t see it, but the two major conferences see value differently... BIG is chasing markets / locations. They have glaring holes in several top ten markets; Dallas, San Fran, Atlanta... </p><p>SEC is chasing big brands / fans... not sure how they value or evaluate those, but in either case, the benefits associated with each team are going to have to be much much larger than the benefits of the teams that came before. When you think of it that way; does any combination of two teams offer bigger, better branding than OK / TX? Does any combination of teams deliver a new market bigger than Los Angeles? </p><p>I guess we will find out... but I also guess that we won’t find out for another 8-10 years, maybe more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CEB, post: 882561, member: 4905"] You’re absolutely right... there is most definitely a point of diminishing return. At some point there are no teams left that move the needle. And it’s not just $80M in your arbitrary example... it’s $80M plus what ever increment per existing team to bring them up to $80M also. Honestly, I don’t see it, but the two major conferences see value differently... BIG is chasing markets / locations. They have glaring holes in several top ten markets; Dallas, San Fran, Atlanta... SEC is chasing big brands / fans... not sure how they value or evaluate those, but in either case, the benefits associated with each team are going to have to be much much larger than the benefits of the teams that came before. When you think of it that way; does any combination of two teams offer bigger, better branding than OK / TX? Does any combination of teams deliver a new market bigger than Los Angeles? I guess we will find out... but I also guess that we won’t find out for another 8-10 years, maybe more. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top