Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 1006382" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Non-lawyer also, but my understanding is that at this point in a case you have to be very careful about reading too much into things. I don't think the court has ruled that the GOR is valid and enforceable. It has only allowed the ACC's claims that "Grant of Rights Agreements are valid and enforceable contracts and that the FSU Board is estopped from making or has waived by its conduct any challenge to the Grant of Rights Agreements" to proceed. It hasn't dismissed that claim. The ACC will still have to prove those claims to the court. Much like a criminal case in a state with probable cause hearings instead of indictments, the court deciding that there is enough probable cause to proceed doesn't mean the defendant is guilty. It just means that the case can proceed further. I think that the ACC will likely win if the case goes all the way to a decision. I am just pointing out that we are very, very far away from an actual decision at this point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 1006382, member: 2426"] Non-lawyer also, but my understanding is that at this point in a case you have to be very careful about reading too much into things. I don't think the court has ruled that the GOR is valid and enforceable. It has only allowed the ACC's claims that "Grant of Rights Agreements are valid and enforceable contracts and that the FSU Board is estopped from making or has waived by its conduct any challenge to the Grant of Rights Agreements" to proceed. It hasn't dismissed that claim. The ACC will still have to prove those claims to the court. Much like a criminal case in a state with probable cause hearings instead of indictments, the court deciding that there is enough probable cause to proceed doesn't mean the defendant is guilty. It just means that the case can proceed further. I think that the ACC will likely win if the case goes all the way to a decision. I am just pointing out that we are very, very far away from an actual decision at this point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top