Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cpf2001" data-source="post: 1003215" data-attributes="member: 6459"><p>Some of these are refutable from independent evidence and/or interpretation of terms like "fiduciary duty." Is it not exceedingly obvious that I'm talking specifically the termination option claims? Why are you asking me to defend FSU's case as a whole?</p><p></p><p></p><p>And why is that? Is it because the ACC has been inept at all things PR for decades?</p><p></p><p>"PR doesn't matter because the ACC's PR has already been terrible"?</p><p></p><p>I'm not disputing the strength of the ACC legal case. I don't care about it that much. I just think your claims that nobody should be suspicious about the termination stuff are hollow. Especially since the ACC is in this position in the first place because of a death by a thousand cuts and you and the ACC seem to believe that a 1001th cut is therefore irrelevant, instead of them needing to take the first step to turn that tide sooner or later.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would you present this as an either/or?</p><p></p><p>How is it even accurate? Releasing a statement to the press along with your legal counter-actions with plain-and-simple "the requests are unjustified, the claims are untrue, and we will do whatever it takes to prove it" English isn't "fans in the bar" level, it's closer to basic corporate ***-covering 101.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cpf2001, post: 1003215, member: 6459"] Some of these are refutable from independent evidence and/or interpretation of terms like "fiduciary duty." Is it not exceedingly obvious that I'm talking specifically the termination option claims? Why are you asking me to defend FSU's case as a whole? And why is that? Is it because the ACC has been inept at all things PR for decades? "PR doesn't matter because the ACC's PR has already been terrible"? I'm not disputing the strength of the ACC legal case. I don't care about it that much. I just think your claims that nobody should be suspicious about the termination stuff are hollow. Especially since the ACC is in this position in the first place because of a death by a thousand cuts and you and the ACC seem to believe that a 1001th cut is therefore irrelevant, instead of them needing to take the first step to turn that tide sooner or later. Why would you present this as an either/or? How is it even accurate? Releasing a statement to the press along with your legal counter-actions with plain-and-simple "the requests are unjustified, the claims are untrue, and we will do whatever it takes to prove it" English isn't "fans in the bar" level, it's closer to basic corporate ***-covering 101. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Conference Realignment
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top