Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
College admissions and rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4shotB" data-source="post: 806659" data-attributes="member: 844"><p>I would imagine that the ROI is better for the low to mid tier academic schools than at Tech or Stanford or equivalent. I think if you look at the transformation of the University of Alabama as a result of their sucess under CNS their football ROI appears to be justified (it's been a few years since I looked at the report on this so I am going on memory here). However, why does GT need to increase the number of qualified applicants vis a vis success on the field of play? Already the cream of the crop students are turned away so why attract more other than to say your acceptance rate is decreasing? Perhaps this is why Tech's admin side has been apparently indifferent over the years to what happens within the athletic department.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="4shotB, post: 806659, member: 844"] I would imagine that the ROI is better for the low to mid tier academic schools than at Tech or Stanford or equivalent. I think if you look at the transformation of the University of Alabama as a result of their sucess under CNS their football ROI appears to be justified (it's been a few years since I looked at the report on this so I am going on memory here). However, why does GT need to increase the number of qualified applicants vis a vis success on the field of play? Already the cream of the crop students are turned away so why attract more other than to say your acceptance rate is decreasing? Perhaps this is why Tech's admin side has been apparently indifferent over the years to what happens within the athletic department. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
College admissions and rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top