Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Clinton & Trump are criminals and should be in jail. /sarcasm
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 361324" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>With all due respect, you again make accusations about my posts without explaining what you're talking about. I listed three facts from which I inferred that Mueller is not being an honest broker in this investigation. That is more than a gut feeling.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">1) Andrew Weismann led the prosecution team in the Enron case which got a conviction of a partner in an Accounting firm. Three years later a UNANIMOUS Supreme Court overturned the conviction ruling that no crime had been committed. Weismann had rewritten the jury instructions to define a crime that didn't exist. He also led the team prosecuting Merrill Lynch executives. 12 of 14 counts were overturned on appeal. That's pretty high profile slaps in the face for prosecutorial over-reach. This guy is not someone you hire if you care about giving the impression of playing within the rule of law.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">2) Jeannie Rhee, not only has she maxed out her donations to Clinton in 2015 and 2016, she defended the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering lawsuit. The point is not that this proves bias but that she cannot be involved in any investigation of wrong-doing connected with the Clinton Foundation. It would be a clear conflict of interest. These are facts.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">3) Nothing more needs to be said about the point of the political donations. The odds would have 25-30% of those making political donations having given to the Republicans, as your link says, but what we have is 0%.</p><p></p><p>Your last questions defy my ability to take them seriously. They simply assume that Trump committed crimes. In a way, they make my point: it's not an honest investigation if it assumes crimes were committed (as your questions assume), especially when one of the attorneys has a record of making up crimes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 361324, member: 195"] With all due respect, you again make accusations about my posts without explaining what you're talking about. I listed three facts from which I inferred that Mueller is not being an honest broker in this investigation. That is more than a gut feeling. [INDENT]1) Andrew Weismann led the prosecution team in the Enron case which got a conviction of a partner in an Accounting firm. Three years later a UNANIMOUS Supreme Court overturned the conviction ruling that no crime had been committed. Weismann had rewritten the jury instructions to define a crime that didn't exist. He also led the team prosecuting Merrill Lynch executives. 12 of 14 counts were overturned on appeal. That's pretty high profile slaps in the face for prosecutorial over-reach. This guy is not someone you hire if you care about giving the impression of playing within the rule of law. 2) Jeannie Rhee, not only has she maxed out her donations to Clinton in 2015 and 2016, she defended the Clinton Foundation in a 2015 racketeering lawsuit. The point is not that this proves bias but that she cannot be involved in any investigation of wrong-doing connected with the Clinton Foundation. It would be a clear conflict of interest. These are facts. 3) Nothing more needs to be said about the point of the political donations. The odds would have 25-30% of those making political donations having given to the Republicans, as your link says, but what we have is 0%.[/INDENT] Your last questions defy my ability to take them seriously. They simply assume that Trump committed crimes. In a way, they make my point: it's not an honest investigation if it assumes crimes were committed (as your questions assume), especially when one of the attorneys has a record of making up crimes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Clinton & Trump are criminals and should be in jail. /sarcasm
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top