Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clinton Lynch
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 264924" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>In 2013, Godhigh had 102 combined "touches" (in 13 games). </p><p>79 rushes for 744 yards (9.4 avg), 7 TDs...longest 65 yards</p><p>23 receptions for 471 yards (20.5 avg), 2 TDs...longest 43 yards</p><p>102 total touches for 1215 yards (11.91 avg), 9 total TDs</p><p>Avg of 7.85 touches per game, 93.46 yards per game, 0.69 TDs per game</p><p>(Interestingly, RG led a team that included future NFL WRs Smelter and Waller in receptions)</p><p></p><p>2016 Clinton Lynch has 46 combined "touches" (through 11 games).</p><p>31 rushes for 333 yards (10.7 avg), 1 TD...longest 45 yards</p><p>15 receptions for 474 yards (31.6 avg), 6 TDs....longest 83 yards</p><p>46 total touches for 807 yards (17.54 avg), 7 total TDs</p><p>Avg of 4.18 touches per game, 73.36 yards per game, 0.63 TDs per game</p><p></p><p>On a "per touch basis", 2016 Lynch easily beats 2013 Godhigh. I think Godhigh is the far stronger runner, and CL is the better receiver, and it goes to their playing history. Godhigh was a very good HS runningback, while CL was good HS WR.</p><p></p><p>CL won't end up with the total touches that 2013 Godhigh had, but his yards per rush is just as strong as RG while his yards per reception is an insane 10 yards per reception better than RG's. </p><p></p><p>It's hard to judge different players from different teams as there's a lot that goes into it (the OL, the QB, which ABs were blocking for who, experience of the team, etc.) but it's safe to say CL is just a VERY good AB for GT. We're lucky we'll have another 2 years of CL to enjoy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 264924, member: 360"] In 2013, Godhigh had 102 combined "touches" (in 13 games). 79 rushes for 744 yards (9.4 avg), 7 TDs...longest 65 yards 23 receptions for 471 yards (20.5 avg), 2 TDs...longest 43 yards 102 total touches for 1215 yards (11.91 avg), 9 total TDs Avg of 7.85 touches per game, 93.46 yards per game, 0.69 TDs per game (Interestingly, RG led a team that included future NFL WRs Smelter and Waller in receptions) 2016 Clinton Lynch has 46 combined "touches" (through 11 games). 31 rushes for 333 yards (10.7 avg), 1 TD...longest 45 yards 15 receptions for 474 yards (31.6 avg), 6 TDs....longest 83 yards 46 total touches for 807 yards (17.54 avg), 7 total TDs Avg of 4.18 touches per game, 73.36 yards per game, 0.63 TDs per game On a "per touch basis", 2016 Lynch easily beats 2013 Godhigh. I think Godhigh is the far stronger runner, and CL is the better receiver, and it goes to their playing history. Godhigh was a very good HS runningback, while CL was good HS WR. CL won't end up with the total touches that 2013 Godhigh had, but his yards per rush is just as strong as RG while his yards per reception is an insane 10 yards per reception better than RG's. It's hard to judge different players from different teams as there's a lot that goes into it (the OL, the QB, which ABs were blocking for who, experience of the team, etc.) but it's safe to say CL is just a VERY good AB for GT. We're lucky we'll have another 2 years of CL to enjoy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clinton Lynch
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top