Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clemson Postgame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 621404" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>As Boomer pointed out some time ago, we recruited just fine. For a spread option. Check the stats on O. That was never the problem. Just last year we were 2nd in the country (2 ypg behind Army) in rushing and had a winning season. The talent we had fitted what we were doing on O. And wasn't that highly rated because we were doing what "nobody else was doing".</p><p></p><p>Now, we are going to need those top 25 - 30 classes going forward to win at a higher rate, as people expect. I think (i.e. hope) our present players will prove out in line with what the coaches are saying, but we desperately need more help on the DL. That's always a hard sell for Tech. I don't have as many fears there as some do. I don't doubt that Coach being a D specialist will make for a better sell to DL players going forward. However, these are the most sought after players in the country; we need to give the new program time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 621404, member: 265"] As Boomer pointed out some time ago, we recruited just fine. For a spread option. Check the stats on O. That was never the problem. Just last year we were 2nd in the country (2 ypg behind Army) in rushing and had a winning season. The talent we had fitted what we were doing on O. And wasn't that highly rated because we were doing what "nobody else was doing". Now, we are going to need those top 25 - 30 classes going forward to win at a higher rate, as people expect. I think (i.e. hope) our present players will prove out in line with what the coaches are saying, but we desperately need more help on the DL. That's always a hard sell for Tech. I don't have as many fears there as some do. I don't doubt that Coach being a D specialist will make for a better sell to DL players going forward. However, these are the most sought after players in the country; we need to give the new program time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clemson Postgame
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top