Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clemson Post-game Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 2897" data-source="post: 754956"><p>Again, the argument someone else made was that our recruiting hadn’t significantly improved under CGC. I was disagreeing with that and showed why. I think most people would agree we’re not “elite” <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤮" title="Face vomiting :face_vomiting:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f92e.png" data-shortname=":face_vomiting:" /> at recruiting right now.</p><p></p><p>Second to that, you then jumped in to say “<em>He has said repeatedly we would recruit at an elite level, ok? At a bare minimum in most people's minds imo, that means classes with high 3s and numerous (5-7) 4s. This has to happen consistently or he has over promised. It hasn't happened yet</em>”. I then showed how we did in fact get several 4-star guys last year. And we’re in about the same place again now that we were last year. CGC is 5 games into his second year coaching and we have something like 15 4-star guys here or committed to who weren’t here before he arrived.</p><p></p><p>I would not say we’re elite at recruiting yet and would agree we need results on the field and better NFL draft numbers to move up another step. I was just pushing back against the idea we’re not significantly better in recruiting than we were.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 2897, post: 754956"] Again, the argument someone else made was that our recruiting hadn’t significantly improved under CGC. I was disagreeing with that and showed why. I think most people would agree we’re not “elite” 🤮 at recruiting right now. Second to that, you then jumped in to say “[I]He has said repeatedly we would recruit at an elite level, ok? At a bare minimum in most people's minds imo, that means classes with high 3s and numerous (5-7) 4s. This has to happen consistently or he has over promised. It hasn't happened yet[/I]”. I then showed how we did in fact get several 4-star guys last year. And we’re in about the same place again now that we were last year. CGC is 5 games into his second year coaching and we have something like 15 4-star guys here or committed to who weren’t here before he arrived. I would not say we’re elite at recruiting yet and would agree we need results on the field and better NFL draft numbers to move up another step. I was just pushing back against the idea we’re not significantly better in recruiting than we were. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clemson Post-game Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top