Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clemson Post-game Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jacketup" data-source="post: 753995" data-attributes="member: 630"><p>I expected to read a lot of stupidity on this board, but it's worse than I thought it would be. People have a right to be upset with the coaching staff---the last one, for failing to recruit.</p><p></p><p>Other than Clayton, who hasn't played for two years, how many upperclassmen are on the ATL at DE and DT? None. At LB, we have one guy Jackson, who is an upperclassman and has the talent to be a P5 player. The safeties are OK, but recruiting rankings aren't the gospel. And we only have one CB upperclassman who is a P5 level player, Swilling. This defense is very, very young, and experience on D is so important. The defense is young because the prior staff did not recruit well. Having 4 or 5 guys who have both the experience and talent to play at this level makes it very easy to create matchups that an offense can win, especially with as many weapons as Clemson has.</p><p></p><p>My complaint is the OL. They aren't that talented, but 4 of the 5 are upperclassmen. I had hoped that they are better than they showed today. But there is no real competition or depth there or we would not be starting a true FR at one tackle. Again, this is the failure of the prior staff to recruit OL. The failures of the OL today kept the D on the field. You geniuses that believe the OC can design plays that can overcome an OL that can't block should stick to watching soap operas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jacketup, post: 753995, member: 630"] I expected to read a lot of stupidity on this board, but it's worse than I thought it would be. People have a right to be upset with the coaching staff---the last one, for failing to recruit. Other than Clayton, who hasn't played for two years, how many upperclassmen are on the ATL at DE and DT? None. At LB, we have one guy Jackson, who is an upperclassman and has the talent to be a P5 player. The safeties are OK, but recruiting rankings aren't the gospel. And we only have one CB upperclassman who is a P5 level player, Swilling. This defense is very, very young, and experience on D is so important. The defense is young because the prior staff did not recruit well. Having 4 or 5 guys who have both the experience and talent to play at this level makes it very easy to create matchups that an offense can win, especially with as many weapons as Clemson has. My complaint is the OL. They aren't that talented, but 4 of the 5 are upperclassmen. I had hoped that they are better than they showed today. But there is no real competition or depth there or we would not be starting a true FR at one tackle. Again, this is the failure of the prior staff to recruit OL. The failures of the OL today kept the D on the field. You geniuses that believe the OC can design plays that can overcome an OL that can't block should stick to watching soap operas. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Clemson Post-game Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top