Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Baseball
Clemson, Baseball
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTNavyNuke" data-source="post: 941100" data-attributes="member: 322"><p>Interesting stats. Most important is 4-3 ACC.</p><p></p><p>Most impressive is 3 ER. We didn't do that against lowly ranked teams. Once against Tenn Tech, uGag and ND each and more 18 times!</p><p></p><p>Not impressive was overall 57% pitches - 7 walks and 2 HBP, but that was balanced by only 4 hits allowed. I don't think we can get to the NCAAs that way. But we can live with the opponent getting .118 BA. And we can live with Vaughan 2.1 IP 0 ER NO HIT / HBP and Busse 2.0 IP 0 ER NO HIT / HBP. We threw a lot of pitches 208 that may come back on us, but got the win. Busse at 37 may be able to pitch 1.0 Sunday if needed, he's said he did that a lot in JuCo.</p><p></p><p>Also not impressive was our O. .269 BA. And RISP was similarly low at .222. We did get 11 hits and 7 walks. We were unfortunate in that we had left 12 on base after 9. So hopefully we get on track today because </p><p></p><p>The D was good in some areas and missed some plays that shoulda been made IMHO. Overall average, Clemson had the error at the end which everyone focuses on. In my reality, the errors at the beginning of the game matter as much too since they reduce the number of batters and pitches and runs count the same regardless of inning. But emotionally, Clemson error B9 with 2 outs was a gift that I'm glad we didn't give back.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=twitter]1639431690920804352[/MEDIA] </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]14182[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTNavyNuke, post: 941100, member: 322"] Interesting stats. Most important is 4-3 ACC. Most impressive is 3 ER. We didn't do that against lowly ranked teams. Once against Tenn Tech, uGag and ND each and more 18 times! Not impressive was overall 57% pitches - 7 walks and 2 HBP, but that was balanced by only 4 hits allowed. I don't think we can get to the NCAAs that way. But we can live with the opponent getting .118 BA. And we can live with Vaughan 2.1 IP 0 ER NO HIT / HBP and Busse 2.0 IP 0 ER NO HIT / HBP. We threw a lot of pitches 208 that may come back on us, but got the win. Busse at 37 may be able to pitch 1.0 Sunday if needed, he's said he did that a lot in JuCo. Also not impressive was our O. .269 BA. And RISP was similarly low at .222. We did get 11 hits and 7 walks. We were unfortunate in that we had left 12 on base after 9. So hopefully we get on track today because The D was good in some areas and missed some plays that shoulda been made IMHO. Overall average, Clemson had the error at the end which everyone focuses on. In my reality, the errors at the beginning of the game matter as much too since they reduce the number of batters and pitches and runs count the same regardless of inning. But emotionally, Clemson error B9 with 2 outs was a gift that I'm glad we didn't give back. [MEDIA=twitter]1639431690920804352[/MEDIA] [ATTACH type="full"]14182[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Baseball
Clemson, Baseball
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top