Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Charting the GT D in 2016 for chunk plays.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="33jacket" data-source="post: 270267" data-attributes="member: 628"><p><strong>Clemson Game:</strong></p><p></p><p>3rd and 3. Cover 3 with MLB Blitz. WR complete for 9. Rolled covg too early to telegraph. Started out trying to disguise in 2 deep. (Zone w/Blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>2nd and 9. Quarter quarter half covg. Rush 4. Rush for 17 yards. Shouldn’t happen in this zone…(zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10. Cover 2, rush 4. Tried to give a man look and rolled into cover 2. TE caught the pass 14 yards in the slot. 51 had a really bad zone here. This is on the MLB…maybe its still a completion, but the TE was way to wide open. Hard to blame Ted on this one. (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>2nd and 4. Man free, basically a sweep play for 17 yards, they sealed the edge nice. O just caught us in the wrong D for this play…coulda been a line check. Rushed 4. (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>3rd and 3. Man free, 5 wr set and ran a qb draw for 12. We blitzed the MLB leaving nothing behind him…If not for a great tackle by the S this one is a house call. My guess is this was a check play. In man run the draw, in zone, check to a sticks route. Just a good O set. (Man, Blitz), FYI, this is the first time a chunk play has happened to tech while playing man this year.</p><p></p><p></p><p>2nd and 8. 12 yard completion out route. Quarter quarter half covg rushed 4 (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>3rd and 9. Both S 15 yards off LOS. Two CB’s 9 yards off LOS. 4 wr set. Rushed 3. Wide open WR in seam for 18 yards. Quarter quarter half coverage with no bliz (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>2nd and 7. 25 yd completion. Rushed 4. quarter quarter half rattle, (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10. 9 yard completion. Quarter quarter half rushed 4 (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10. 9 yard completion. Quarter quarter half rushed 4 (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10. 16 yard run. Quarters rushed 4 (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10. Cover 3, rush . smash route for 24 yard completion to wr. (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>2nd and 10. WR screen for 9. Quarter quarter half coverage. Rush 4. (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>3rd and 5. 10 yard completion. Cover 4. Rush 3, big cushions (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10. 9 yard completion Exact same D as last down above…literally…Cover 4, rush 3 (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 12. We start out looking exactly like the down above, this is 3 consecutive plays, but we roll from a cover 4 into cover 3, rush 3, blitzed 2 (total of 5) pass complete for 18 yards. (zone, blitz)</p><p></p><p>1st and 10. Ok, this is the 4th consecutive play…exact same coverage as first two. Cover 4, rush 3, middle curl for 28 yards. (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10, this is the 5th consecutive play…we show man free, with a zone dog blitz. Rushed 3, one drops (2) and blitzed 2 LB. The one who dropped was 54…complete pass for 10 yards. Basically, here, Clemson is on the 13 about to score, so we brought a more exotic look. Clemson essentially chunk played us 5 straight plays all above…3 in the same D. One rolled into cover 3 and one man. This series was hard to watch. (man, zone dog blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Second Half</p><p></p><p>1st and 10. Quarter quarter half coverage, rushed 4. Rush for 10 yards. Should not happen in this d. (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>1st and 10. Quarter quarter half. Rush 12 yards. Rushed 4. (zone no blitz)</p><p></p><p></p><p>There were a handful of 8 yard plays…but my criteria was 10 or 9 if a big down…so that’s it for second half.</p><p></p><p></p><p>First I want to say…after watching this it was really frustrating. The chunk plays are starting to have a bigtime trend now after watching 3 games. They almost always come when we run a quarter quarter half scheme. Which is a version of Cover 4. 13 of the 20 chunk plays we were in quarter quarter half or straight up quarters with either 3 or 4 rushers. Never once blitzed in this set. Only once, did we disquise as a quarters D and roll into a cover 3 with a 5 man rush/blitz in a chunk play. Which means blitzing in this coverage works better, and we don’t see it show up as a chunk play yet. Only two chunk plays were in man.</p><p></p><p></p><p>After 3 games, OVER half the chunk plays come on 1stdown. Of those, we are basically always in cover 4, or quarter quarter half coverage with no blitzing. This is astounding self scouting data to me. It really suggests we have an issue in that coverage. Now, we play that coverage a lot too…so naturally, you are going to have MORE chunk plays against it. But the problem with that is two fold. First, we have had only 2 chunk plays in man after 3 games. We play man WAY more than that. Second, the lack of blitzing. Again, we blitz more than that…so what this tells me is we were more effective blitzing and playing man….than zone, especially on first down. As ZERO chunk plays have showed up on first down while blitzing or playing man.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another thing I am noticing. All season we talked about not getting off the field. This is true, 3rd down conversion rates are bad. But whats behind the data, is how many yards we have given up on first down. Its eye popping; and basically always the same coverage up to NOW.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Miami next</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="33jacket, post: 270267, member: 628"] [B]Clemson Game:[/B] 3rd and 3. Cover 3 with MLB Blitz. WR complete for 9. Rolled covg too early to telegraph. Started out trying to disguise in 2 deep. (Zone w/Blitz) 2nd and 9. Quarter quarter half covg. Rush 4. Rush for 17 yards. Shouldn’t happen in this zone…(zone no blitz) 1st and 10. Cover 2, rush 4. Tried to give a man look and rolled into cover 2. TE caught the pass 14 yards in the slot. 51 had a really bad zone here. This is on the MLB…maybe its still a completion, but the TE was way to wide open. Hard to blame Ted on this one. (zone no blitz) 2nd and 4. Man free, basically a sweep play for 17 yards, they sealed the edge nice. O just caught us in the wrong D for this play…coulda been a line check. Rushed 4. (zone no blitz) 3rd and 3. Man free, 5 wr set and ran a qb draw for 12. We blitzed the MLB leaving nothing behind him…If not for a great tackle by the S this one is a house call. My guess is this was a check play. In man run the draw, in zone, check to a sticks route. Just a good O set. (Man, Blitz), FYI, this is the first time a chunk play has happened to tech while playing man this year. 2nd and 8. 12 yard completion out route. Quarter quarter half covg rushed 4 (zone no blitz) 3rd and 9. Both S 15 yards off LOS. Two CB’s 9 yards off LOS. 4 wr set. Rushed 3. Wide open WR in seam for 18 yards. Quarter quarter half coverage with no bliz (zone no blitz) 2nd and 7. 25 yd completion. Rushed 4. quarter quarter half rattle, (zone no blitz) 1st and 10. 9 yard completion. Quarter quarter half rushed 4 (zone no blitz) 1st and 10. 9 yard completion. Quarter quarter half rushed 4 (zone no blitz) 1st and 10. 16 yard run. Quarters rushed 4 (zone no blitz) 1st and 10. Cover 3, rush . smash route for 24 yard completion to wr. (zone no blitz) 2nd and 10. WR screen for 9. Quarter quarter half coverage. Rush 4. (zone no blitz) 3rd and 5. 10 yard completion. Cover 4. Rush 3, big cushions (zone no blitz) 1st and 10. 9 yard completion Exact same D as last down above…literally…Cover 4, rush 3 (zone no blitz) 1st and 12. We start out looking exactly like the down above, this is 3 consecutive plays, but we roll from a cover 4 into cover 3, rush 3, blitzed 2 (total of 5) pass complete for 18 yards. (zone, blitz) 1st and 10. Ok, this is the 4th consecutive play…exact same coverage as first two. Cover 4, rush 3, middle curl for 28 yards. (zone no blitz) 1st and 10, this is the 5th consecutive play…we show man free, with a zone dog blitz. Rushed 3, one drops (2) and blitzed 2 LB. The one who dropped was 54…complete pass for 10 yards. Basically, here, Clemson is on the 13 about to score, so we brought a more exotic look. Clemson essentially chunk played us 5 straight plays all above…3 in the same D. One rolled into cover 3 and one man. This series was hard to watch. (man, zone dog blitz) Second Half 1st and 10. Quarter quarter half coverage, rushed 4. Rush for 10 yards. Should not happen in this d. (zone no blitz) 1st and 10. Quarter quarter half. Rush 12 yards. Rushed 4. (zone no blitz) There were a handful of 8 yard plays…but my criteria was 10 or 9 if a big down…so that’s it for second half. First I want to say…after watching this it was really frustrating. The chunk plays are starting to have a bigtime trend now after watching 3 games. They almost always come when we run a quarter quarter half scheme. Which is a version of Cover 4. 13 of the 20 chunk plays we were in quarter quarter half or straight up quarters with either 3 or 4 rushers. Never once blitzed in this set. Only once, did we disquise as a quarters D and roll into a cover 3 with a 5 man rush/blitz in a chunk play. Which means blitzing in this coverage works better, and we don’t see it show up as a chunk play yet. Only two chunk plays were in man. After 3 games, OVER half the chunk plays come on 1stdown. Of those, we are basically always in cover 4, or quarter quarter half coverage with no blitzing. This is astounding self scouting data to me. It really suggests we have an issue in that coverage. Now, we play that coverage a lot too…so naturally, you are going to have MORE chunk plays against it. But the problem with that is two fold. First, we have had only 2 chunk plays in man after 3 games. We play man WAY more than that. Second, the lack of blitzing. Again, we blitz more than that…so what this tells me is we were more effective blitzing and playing man….than zone, especially on first down. As ZERO chunk plays have showed up on first down while blitzing or playing man. Another thing I am noticing. All season we talked about not getting off the field. This is true, 3rd down conversion rates are bad. But whats behind the data, is how many yards we have given up on first down. Its eye popping; and basically always the same coverage up to NOW. Miami next [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Charting the GT D in 2016 for chunk plays.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top