Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Bowling Green Post Game... 😢
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 964917" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>Well, that was a humiliating experience. My impressions:</p><p></p><p>The Good:</p><p>• The first two series on O and D were up to expectations.</p><p></p><p>The Bad:</p><p>• #1 with a bullet: Tech can't run the ball. That makes everything else much more difficult. I wish Dontae Smith had been out there; he can hit a hole with authority, None of our other backs can, at present. And, btw, I watched the game through my binocs as usual. RBs were simply missing clear holes and running into defenders.</p><p>• Again, I'll point out that we are running a Bammer/Dwag style O without the talent to do it. Why can't the OC adjust to what we have and show a little innovation?</p><p>• The WRs disappointed me this time, but part of that was bad throws. I mean, you get wide open, you expect the QB to get the ball to you, right?</p><p>• Tech turned the ball over three times. That, combined with our lack of a sound running game, spelled disaster.</p><p>• BGU had the ball over 42 minutes, 2.5 times longer then Tech. With our D that is also a recipe for disaster. The DL was already fagged out at the half. I don't want to hear any more about how "unimportant" TOP is.</p><p>• And, again btw, the entire center of our DL is too big and slow.. The rush ends are alright, but BG was able to hold them off just long enough. We might try Kennard inside and see what happens. Trying to match size against size with little in the way of stunts isn't working.</p><p>• King had a so-so game, but he isn't the QB Tech needs in short yardage situations. Like our RBs he doesn't run with suthority. If I were Key, I'd take a page from Paul's book and put Rhoads in within the 10, just like Tim Byerley. He <em>can</em> run and he's an good passer. Btw yet again, I think we saw yesterday why Fisher blew hot and cold on King.</p><p>• The special teams returned to early season form on punts. KO returns were ok, as was the FG kicking. Why is there always <em>something?</em></p><p></p><p>I left at the half. I could see where things were going. I said when we beat Wake that I thought we could win 6. I watched the Army - Syracuse game before I left the house. I now think we might win 4.</p><p></p><p>One thing I noticed that I liked was that Tech was holding a bundle of players out of the game. If we keep them and develop them, we'll be going in the right direction. Tech probably needs to endure a little pain first. Again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 964917, member: 265"] Well, that was a humiliating experience. My impressions: The Good: • The first two series on O and D were up to expectations. The Bad: • #1 with a bullet: Tech can't run the ball. That makes everything else much more difficult. I wish Dontae Smith had been out there; he can hit a hole with authority, None of our other backs can, at present. And, btw, I watched the game through my binocs as usual. RBs were simply missing clear holes and running into defenders. • Again, I'll point out that we are running a Bammer/Dwag style O without the talent to do it. Why can't the OC adjust to what we have and show a little innovation? • The WRs disappointed me this time, but part of that was bad throws. I mean, you get wide open, you expect the QB to get the ball to you, right? • Tech turned the ball over three times. That, combined with our lack of a sound running game, spelled disaster. • BGU had the ball over 42 minutes, 2.5 times longer then Tech. With our D that is also a recipe for disaster. The DL was already fagged out at the half. I don't want to hear any more about how "unimportant" TOP is. • And, again btw, the entire center of our DL is too big and slow.. The rush ends are alright, but BG was able to hold them off just long enough. We might try Kennard inside and see what happens. Trying to match size against size with little in the way of stunts isn't working. • King had a so-so game, but he isn't the QB Tech needs in short yardage situations. Like our RBs he doesn't run with suthority. If I were Key, I'd take a page from Paul's book and put Rhoads in within the 10, just like Tim Byerley. He [I]can[/I] run and he's an good passer. Btw yet again, I think we saw yesterday why Fisher blew hot and cold on King. • The special teams returned to early season form on punts. KO returns were ok, as was the FG kicking. Why is there always [I]something?[/I] I left at the half. I could see where things were going. I said when we beat Wake that I thought we could win 6. I watched the Army - Syracuse game before I left the house. I now think we might win 4. One thing I noticed that I liked was that Tech was holding a bundle of players out of the game. If we keep them and develop them, we'll be going in the right direction. Tech probably needs to endure a little pain first. Again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Bowling Green Post Game... 😢
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top