Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Boston College Post Game Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 969746" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>Of course I considered coaching. </p><p></p><p>The justification for the talent composite is the idea that the largest factor in on field performance is talent. If you’re going to say the largest factor is coaching, then that means the recruiting ratings aren’t that important. </p><p></p><p>Also, a coach at a press conference is going to say “it’s the coaching”. He won’t necessarily give the same answer to his best friend or his fellow coaches. </p><p></p><p>Here’s a few entries from the 2023 talent composite </p><p>35. Colorado </p><p>36. Georgia Tech</p><p>37. Stanford</p><p>38. NCST</p><p>39. Pitt</p><p></p><p>41. Iowa</p><p>54 BC</p><p>67 Duke</p><p>71 Tulane</p><p>111. Bowling Green</p><p></p><p>Results are all over the place. Are they really that strongly correlated to the talent composite?</p><p></p><p>Are we out recruiting Iowa?</p><p></p><p>How do we have about the same rating as NCST and much better than Duke and BC, but nowhere near the number of all-ACC players?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 969746, member: 282"] Of course I considered coaching. The justification for the talent composite is the idea that the largest factor in on field performance is talent. If you’re going to say the largest factor is coaching, then that means the recruiting ratings aren’t that important. Also, a coach at a press conference is going to say “it’s the coaching”. He won’t necessarily give the same answer to his best friend or his fellow coaches. Here’s a few entries from the 2023 talent composite 35. Colorado 36. Georgia Tech 37. Stanford 38. NCST 39. Pitt 41. Iowa 54 BC 67 Duke 71 Tulane 111. Bowling Green Results are all over the place. Are they really that strongly correlated to the talent composite? Are we out recruiting Iowa? How do we have about the same rating as NCST and much better than Duke and BC, but nowhere near the number of all-ACC players? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Boston College Post Game Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top