Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Techcaster572" data-source="post: 1059524" data-attributes="member: 6770">Here is the biggest problem with the so called &quot;make up&quot; calls.Generally, it&#039;s because incompetent or horrendous call/calls are made against a team, and the stripes feel the need to balance it out.Here&#039;s the problem.... when does an egregious call go in favor of tech... I&#039;m waiting. Last, I truly remember was Jasper Sanks and the SEC punished those refs as if to make a statement...you better not get out of line. Anyone remembers the uga games in 04 (ridiculous fumble call resulted in a ugag td), this year, and many others.For the most part, the make-up calls mean little to the game; however, the bad calls come at the most critical part of the game.Picking up the flag (after already throwing it) on the catch kick interference was horrendous! The game was 14-13 Vandy and we would have had the ball at the 40 vs our 2-yard line.The PI, another egregious call, came at a critical part of the game.I don&#039;t care about make up calls and things balancing out. That is why some of us feel there is an agenda tied to money and power.There is no question that the sec and big 10 want to rule college football and ice out the Acc and Big 12.It&#039;s why they tie so value to preseason rankings based on recruiting rankings that its next to impossible to knock them out of the top 15 as they say...well they beat a quality team and &quot;their conference games are brutal&quot;. It&#039;s why they make the argument that Alabama, USC, and/or Ole Missy should&#039;ve made the playoffs. All based on Sec perception.Let&#039;s be real...Ole miss lost to a pathetic kensucky team that louisville destroyed. Alabama got SMOKED by oklahoma. This is why they pump up conference superiority as the elite ONLY wants a Big 10 and SEC CFP playoff invitational....Tell me I&#039;m wrong!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Techcaster572, post: 1059524, member: 6770"] Here is the biggest problem with the so called "make up" calls. Generally, it's because incompetent or horrendous call/calls are made against a team, and the stripes feel the need to balance it out. Here's the problem.... when does an egregious call go in favor of tech... I'm waiting. Last, I truly remember was Jasper Sanks and the SEC punished those refs as if to make a statement...you better not get out of line. Anyone remembers the uga games in 04 (ridiculous fumble call resulted in a ugag td), this year, and many others. For the most part, the make-up calls mean little to the game; however, the bad calls come at the most critical part of the game. Picking up the flag (after already throwing it) on the catch kick interference was horrendous! The game was 14-13 Vandy and we would have had the ball at the 40 vs our 2-yard line. The PI, another egregious call, came at a critical part of the game. I don't care about make up calls and things balancing out. That is why some of us feel there is an agenda tied to money and power. There is no question that the sec and big 10 want to rule college football and ice out the Acc and Big 12. It's why they tie so value to preseason rankings based on recruiting rankings that its next to impossible to knock them out of the top 15 as they say...well they beat a quality team and "their conference games are brutal". It's why they make the argument that Alabama, USC, and/or Ole Missy should've made the playoffs. All based on Sec perception. Let's be real...Ole miss lost to a pathetic kensucky team that louisville destroyed. Alabama got SMOKED by oklahoma. This is why they pump up conference superiority as the elite ONLY wants a Big 10 and SEC CFP playoff invitational....Tell me I'm wrong! [/QUOTE]

Verification

How many overtimes were there in COFH 2024?