Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
BC Post Game Melt Down Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 757126" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>The notion about Graham and short and intermediate passes was whether he could be consistent enough with them to sustain drives, not whether he could complete them at all. He completed some short and intermediate passes last year but not enough to consistently move the ball hence our struggles on offense (along with other factors). </p><p></p><p>Against BC Graham got 4 drives. </p><p></p><p>1 was a three and out. </p><p>1 was a good drive getting 7 points</p><p>1 was a and okay drive on a short field with one earned first down and one first down via penalty that fizzled. In a different situation we probably go for a FG and might get point. </p><p>1 was a 4 and out</p><p></p><p>Yes he was good on one drive, and overall made some nice plays but he also had issues sustaining drives. Even on his best drive where we scored a TD it was a 4th and 7 on our own 48. If it isn't a 28 point game and BC starting to play some back ups that is likely a 3 and out as well. That drive also saw us have another 4th and 9 as well which in a different situation would have probably been a FGA. </p><p></p><p>Graham showed flashes of potential last year enough where if he was the starter this year I think he could develop into a good QB for us. But he had big issues being consistent enough to move the ball, and that was still an issue again against BC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 757126, member: 2299"] The notion about Graham and short and intermediate passes was whether he could be consistent enough with them to sustain drives, not whether he could complete them at all. He completed some short and intermediate passes last year but not enough to consistently move the ball hence our struggles on offense (along with other factors). Against BC Graham got 4 drives. 1 was a three and out. 1 was a good drive getting 7 points 1 was a and okay drive on a short field with one earned first down and one first down via penalty that fizzled. In a different situation we probably go for a FG and might get point. 1 was a 4 and out Yes he was good on one drive, and overall made some nice plays but he also had issues sustaining drives. Even on his best drive where we scored a TD it was a 4th and 7 on our own 48. If it isn't a 28 point game and BC starting to play some back ups that is likely a 3 and out as well. That drive also saw us have another 4th and 9 as well which in a different situation would have probably been a FGA. Graham showed flashes of potential last year enough where if he was the starter this year I think he could develop into a good QB for us. But he had big issues being consistent enough to move the ball, and that was still an issue again against BC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
BC Post Game Melt Down Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top