Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Bama Basketball murder case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bobongo" data-source="post: 937037" data-attributes="member: 3893"><p>It doesn't look like there's any criminal liability here at all. Miller returned Miles' gun to him, which he said he left in the back seat of Miller's vehicle. Miles then gave his gun to the guy who committed the crime. Miller is fully one step removed from any possible charge. It wasn't Miller's gun, and he didn't supply it to the perp. Unless it can be shown that Miller knew a crime was going to be committed with the gun, which was not his, there's no statute he could be charged under.</p><p></p><p>I don't know what "prior situations" you're referring to. If you can find an instance of charges applied where a gun was returned to its rightful owner who then supplied that gun to someone else who committed a crime which there's no evidence the person returning the gun had any knowledge was going to occur, I don't see any double standard in applying the law. If Miller <em>did</em> know a crime was going to be committed with the gun, then that changes the equation. But I've seen no indication of any such prior knowledge. If some evidence of prior knowledge emerges, that might change things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bobongo, post: 937037, member: 3893"] It doesn't look like there's any criminal liability here at all. Miller returned Miles' gun to him, which he said he left in the back seat of Miller's vehicle. Miles then gave his gun to the guy who committed the crime. Miller is fully one step removed from any possible charge. It wasn't Miller's gun, and he didn't supply it to the perp. Unless it can be shown that Miller knew a crime was going to be committed with the gun, which was not his, there's no statute he could be charged under. I don't know what "prior situations" you're referring to. If you can find an instance of charges applied where a gun was returned to its rightful owner who then supplied that gun to someone else who committed a crime which there's no evidence the person returning the gun had any knowledge was going to occur, I don't see any double standard in applying the law. If Miller [I]did[/I] know a crime was going to be committed with the gun, then that changes the equation. But I've seen no indication of any such prior knowledge. If some evidence of prior knowledge emerges, that might change things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Bama Basketball murder case
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top