Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Assessing the Impact of GT Presidents on GT Athletics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 684012" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Seem to be going in circles. Claims are made the Peterson was bad for athletics and that he actively disliked athletics. When [USER=198]@forensicbuzz[/USER] made a statement that he acted appropriately toward athletics for a university president, a statement was made that the: "Least he can do is not make it harder to be a student athlete than a regular student". When I ask about that statement what Peterson did to make is harder to be a student athlete, you respond that that question is not appropriate, we should ask what he did to make it easier.</p><p></p><p>If you have specific allegations about what Peterson failed to do for athletics, that is a normal activity for university presidents I am all ears. So far it is all ambiguous statements that he hated athletics. I haven't seen any actual action items that he should have acted on. With MBob, it is easy to list failures as an athletic director: He avoided fans, He avoided large donors, He avoided GTAA staff, He turned down donations with specific purposes, etc: If you have actual items for Peterson similar to those for MBob, please list them instead of continuing with non-specific emotional based statements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 684012, member: 2426"] Seem to be going in circles. Claims are made the Peterson was bad for athletics and that he actively disliked athletics. When [USER=198]@forensicbuzz[/USER] made a statement that he acted appropriately toward athletics for a university president, a statement was made that the: "Least he can do is not make it harder to be a student athlete than a regular student". When I ask about that statement what Peterson did to make is harder to be a student athlete, you respond that that question is not appropriate, we should ask what he did to make it easier. If you have specific allegations about what Peterson failed to do for athletics, that is a normal activity for university presidents I am all ears. So far it is all ambiguous statements that he hated athletics. I haven't seen any actual action items that he should have acted on. With MBob, it is easy to list failures as an athletic director: He avoided fans, He avoided large donors, He avoided GTAA staff, He turned down donations with specific purposes, etc: If you have actual items for Peterson similar to those for MBob, please list them instead of continuing with non-specific emotional based statements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Assessing the Impact of GT Presidents on GT Athletics
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top