Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Arrests coming due to college bball kickbacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTRX7" data-source="post: 566862" data-attributes="member: 1045"><p>You are correct that I did misremember the Rose facts. The SAT testing agency flagged Rose's SAT as questionable and started an investigation. Rose was notified of this in March and April during the NCAA tournament, though he did not tell Memphis. It was that investigation, by the SAT testing agency not the NCAA, that Rose failed to cooperate with. Although the SAT testing agency did not have proof that he cheated, because Rose failed to cooperate with the investigation, they invalidated his test in May after the tourney was over. (Note, I do think he probably cheated on the test and that is why he didn't cooperate. I have no issue with his test being invalidated for not cooperating.)</p><p></p><p>However, I stand by my larger point. I agree that the NCAA does not have subpoena power. Like the SAT testing company that also did not have subpoena power, however, that does not mean they don't have penalties they can enforce if someone doesn't voluntarily cooperate with an investigation. Even without subpoena power, it is my understanding that the NCAA has the power to suspend active players and coaches for not voluntarily cooperating with investigations. They cannot fine or jail them for not cooperating, but they can control who is eligible to participate in their organization. "Failure to cooperate in an NCAA enforcement investigation" is itself an NCAA "Level I" violation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTRX7, post: 566862, member: 1045"] You are correct that I did misremember the Rose facts. The SAT testing agency flagged Rose's SAT as questionable and started an investigation. Rose was notified of this in March and April during the NCAA tournament, though he did not tell Memphis. It was that investigation, by the SAT testing agency not the NCAA, that Rose failed to cooperate with. Although the SAT testing agency did not have proof that he cheated, because Rose failed to cooperate with the investigation, they invalidated his test in May after the tourney was over. (Note, I do think he probably cheated on the test and that is why he didn't cooperate. I have no issue with his test being invalidated for not cooperating.) However, I stand by my larger point. I agree that the NCAA does not have subpoena power. Like the SAT testing company that also did not have subpoena power, however, that does not mean they don't have penalties they can enforce if someone doesn't voluntarily cooperate with an investigation. Even without subpoena power, it is my understanding that the NCAA has the power to suspend active players and coaches for not voluntarily cooperating with investigations. They cannot fine or jail them for not cooperating, but they can control who is eligible to participate in their organization. "Failure to cooperate in an NCAA enforcement investigation" is itself an NCAA "Level I" violation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Arrests coming due to college bball kickbacks
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top