Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Are you now, or have you ever been, a denier of AGW?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Northeast Stinger" data-source="post: 140897" data-attributes="member: 1640"><p>Thank you for your diplomatic response.</p><p></p><p>All of the investigations into this did not yield any thing close to the kind of evidence that would justify the continuing partisan haranguing that we have gotten on the topic. And though you are certainly entitled to your opinion, that was never the official finding of any of the major investigations. </p><p></p><p>By contrast consider the attack that occurred in Lebanon in 1982. 241 Americans died, not 4. There was one main investigation (conducted by the Reagan Administration who were the ones responsible for the policy in the first place) not over 50 investigations. The military chain of command was found to be at fault but no one was relieved of command and no one was asked to resign from the Administration, as had been repeatedly called for in the case of Benghazi. Several recommendations were made after the attack in Lebanon, virtually most of which were never followed. </p><p></p><p>Recommendations have been made in the aftermath of Benghazi. We shall see if they make a difference. One troubling thing to me was that, not unlike the false information about Iraq having nuclear and biological weapons prior to the Iraq invasion, the administration once again pointed to the CIA as the source of their bad intelligence talking points. So apparently all of the stuff that went wrong during the Bush Administration has still not been cleaned up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Northeast Stinger, post: 140897, member: 1640"] Thank you for your diplomatic response. All of the investigations into this did not yield any thing close to the kind of evidence that would justify the continuing partisan haranguing that we have gotten on the topic. And though you are certainly entitled to your opinion, that was never the official finding of any of the major investigations. By contrast consider the attack that occurred in Lebanon in 1982. 241 Americans died, not 4. There was one main investigation (conducted by the Reagan Administration who were the ones responsible for the policy in the first place) not over 50 investigations. The military chain of command was found to be at fault but no one was relieved of command and no one was asked to resign from the Administration, as had been repeatedly called for in the case of Benghazi. Several recommendations were made after the attack in Lebanon, virtually most of which were never followed. Recommendations have been made in the aftermath of Benghazi. We shall see if they make a difference. One troubling thing to me was that, not unlike the false information about Iraq having nuclear and biological weapons prior to the Iraq invasion, the administration once again pointed to the CIA as the source of their bad intelligence talking points. So apparently all of the stuff that went wrong during the Bush Administration has still not been cleaned up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Are you now, or have you ever been, a denier of AGW?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top