Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Any updates on NSD?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTrob21" data-source="post: 864024" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>I agree, as a business person myself, if a CEO produced the results he has produced, with the historical product he has, he would have been gone, or the buy-out talks would have already started.</p><p></p><p>I know our financial situation is tough, but waiting only extends the damage done to the brand. People don't want to recognize that our brand with the previous coach was being used as inferior. They would call us a "High school offense" to recruits and in conversation it worked. Because the basic drive of any young athlete is to achieve at the highest level. That is it.</p><p></p><p>That is why that simple criticism is so effective against us. An conversely, that is why our response of it being 40 year decision, is so tepid. The mindset of young athletes, by nature of their discipline isn't a long term thinking environment.</p><p></p><p>If we were a championship level team, then our hook of a 40 year degree, and the value of our brand would tip recruits to our favor. But if we are honest, it hasn't for a long time now.</p><p></p><p>We have to win and we have to decide if we are going to pay the money to win. It's that simple. If not, they we should drop down, take our great academic Institute, and great 40 year degree and become MIT.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTrob21, post: 864024, member: 84"] I agree, as a business person myself, if a CEO produced the results he has produced, with the historical product he has, he would have been gone, or the buy-out talks would have already started. I know our financial situation is tough, but waiting only extends the damage done to the brand. People don't want to recognize that our brand with the previous coach was being used as inferior. They would call us a "High school offense" to recruits and in conversation it worked. Because the basic drive of any young athlete is to achieve at the highest level. That is it. That is why that simple criticism is so effective against us. An conversely, that is why our response of it being 40 year decision, is so tepid. The mindset of young athletes, by nature of their discipline isn't a long term thinking environment. If we were a championship level team, then our hook of a 40 year degree, and the value of our brand would tip recruits to our favor. But if we are honest, it hasn't for a long time now. We have to win and we have to decide if we are going to pay the money to win. It's that simple. If not, they we should drop down, take our great academic Institute, and great 40 year degree and become MIT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Any updates on NSD?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top