Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Another Hot Coffee/Tea Incident
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldJacketFan" data-source="post: 340896" data-attributes="member: 304"><p>No not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV nor did I sleep at a Holiday Inn last night and, trust me, nothing that comes out of your month is capable of hurting my feelings. Simply someone who has spent his professional career (30 plus years) investigating and resolving claims including claims such as this, I think I'm have a wee bit more expertise in this area and am a bit more qualified to speak on tort claims. I've never made a snap judgement based on a claim report as to is a claim has validity. If you look at my first post on this thread I made the comment that it will be interesting to see what comes out through discovery. For someone who has railed on other threads about "fake news" you sure are drinking from that cup here that the news report is gospel.</p><p></p><p>As I noted the evidence will speak for itself and that how I evaluate claims. I would love to see the video, but it in itself may not be the end all, be all depending on a number of factors. If I were handling the case for Starbucks I would be privy to the results of the discovery and form my evaluation from there. It is very possible the case may have merit, at the stage neither you or I know if it does or doesn't. Oh and no, suits like this do not screw up either our medical of legal system in any shape, form or fashion or are you someone that believes in limiting the common man's access to the judicial system? </p><p></p><p>And yes, it is possible (never alleged it wasn't) to have a higher % of a given type of juror (male v female, white v black etc) but like I said if a juror demonstrates an overt prejudice counsel on both side will try to strike those jurors that may be predisposed either way. You may not like the jury system but if works a lot more often than it doesn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldJacketFan, post: 340896, member: 304"] No not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV nor did I sleep at a Holiday Inn last night and, trust me, nothing that comes out of your month is capable of hurting my feelings. Simply someone who has spent his professional career (30 plus years) investigating and resolving claims including claims such as this, I think I'm have a wee bit more expertise in this area and am a bit more qualified to speak on tort claims. I've never made a snap judgement based on a claim report as to is a claim has validity. If you look at my first post on this thread I made the comment that it will be interesting to see what comes out through discovery. For someone who has railed on other threads about "fake news" you sure are drinking from that cup here that the news report is gospel. As I noted the evidence will speak for itself and that how I evaluate claims. I would love to see the video, but it in itself may not be the end all, be all depending on a number of factors. If I were handling the case for Starbucks I would be privy to the results of the discovery and form my evaluation from there. It is very possible the case may have merit, at the stage neither you or I know if it does or doesn't. Oh and no, suits like this do not screw up either our medical of legal system in any shape, form or fashion or are you someone that believes in limiting the common man's access to the judicial system? And yes, it is possible (never alleged it wasn't) to have a higher % of a given type of juror (male v female, white v black etc) but like I said if a juror demonstrates an overt prejudice counsel on both side will try to strike those jurors that may be predisposed either way. You may not like the jury system but if works a lot more often than it doesn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
Another Hot Coffee/Tea Incident
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top