Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
ACC Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RamblinRed" data-source="post: 547578" data-attributes="member: 1776"><p>one correction. Moore was at #86 after 6 games so he is down slightly.</p><p></p><p>It should not be a big surprise that most ratings went down. That middle stretch was brutal both in terms of the level of competition and the results.</p><p></p><p>I tweaked this over the years and prefer efficiency per game metrics to efficiency per possession or minute metrics because the per possession metrics will often overrate some players. For example, if you used my eff per min metric or the PER, then Jay Huff of UVA would be ranked as one of the 10-15 best players in the conference. But i feel like if he really was one of the 10 best players in the conference Bennett would play him more than 9 mpg. in my per game metric he ranks #99.</p><p></p><p>You can decide for yourself if you like the rankings - here are the Top 20</p><p>Williamson - Duke 37.42</p><p>Barrett - Duke 29.25</p><p>Blackshear - VT 25.43</p><p>White - UNC 25.29</p><p>Johnson - Pitt 25.08</p><p>Robinson - VT 25.00</p><p>Johnson - UNC 24.21</p><p>Reed - Clem 23.96</p><p>Bowman - BC 23.58</p><p>Alexander-Walker - VT 22.64</p><p>Battle - Syr 22.33</p><p>Mooney - ND 22.00</p><p>Jerome - UVA 21.71</p><p>Lykes - Mia 21.46</p><p>Kabengele - FSU 20.33</p><p>Hunter - UVA 20.08</p><p>Nwora - L'ville 19.46</p><p>Maye - UNC 19.46</p><p>Jones - Duke 19.05</p><p>Gibbs - ND 19.05</p><p></p><p>In past years 20 has been close to the cutoff for All-ACC level players and that appears to be holding again. i usually get 1 or 2 players per year that avg close to 30, so that 37.42 is sort of insane.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RamblinRed, post: 547578, member: 1776"] one correction. Moore was at #86 after 6 games so he is down slightly. It should not be a big surprise that most ratings went down. That middle stretch was brutal both in terms of the level of competition and the results. I tweaked this over the years and prefer efficiency per game metrics to efficiency per possession or minute metrics because the per possession metrics will often overrate some players. For example, if you used my eff per min metric or the PER, then Jay Huff of UVA would be ranked as one of the 10-15 best players in the conference. But i feel like if he really was one of the 10 best players in the conference Bennett would play him more than 9 mpg. in my per game metric he ranks #99. You can decide for yourself if you like the rankings - here are the Top 20 Williamson - Duke 37.42 Barrett - Duke 29.25 Blackshear - VT 25.43 White - UNC 25.29 Johnson - Pitt 25.08 Robinson - VT 25.00 Johnson - UNC 24.21 Reed - Clem 23.96 Bowman - BC 23.58 Alexander-Walker - VT 22.64 Battle - Syr 22.33 Mooney - ND 22.00 Jerome - UVA 21.71 Lykes - Mia 21.46 Kabengele - FSU 20.33 Hunter - UVA 20.08 Nwora - L'ville 19.46 Maye - UNC 19.46 Jones - Duke 19.05 Gibbs - ND 19.05 In past years 20 has been close to the cutoff for All-ACC level players and that appears to be holding again. i usually get 1 or 2 players per year that avg close to 30, so that 37.42 is sort of insane. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
ACC Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top