Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ACC Discussion 2020
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 2897" data-source="post: 761957"><p>Yea its a mess. Mississippi State was apparently below the 53 player availability threshhold that would have let them postpone the game against Georgia, but they played anyway. (And nearly won.)</p><p></p><p>Florida State was quoted as being concerned that since they were already a little thin due to their own covid/injury issues, that getting more spread potentially from Clemson would leave them unable to play in the next couple of weeks against Virginia and Duke. Note those games are significantly more winnable games than Clemson. You can read into that what you will.</p><p></p><p>Now having said that, Clemson does hold fault here. We've been in this heavy testing regimen for a long time. You shouldn't be taking your pre-game tests so close that you can't get them back in time. And to that point, if I were a coach like Dabo and its time to get on the plane and you don't have a couple test results back yet - those guys can't travel (especially given this guy was a backup). Sucks, but IIWII. IMHO they got lazy assuming they would all be negative tests and let him/them travel anyway.</p><p></p><p>To me, its a hole in the conference protocols if players without the required test results can still travel to games. That shouldn't even be a thing. I have no idea how that's even possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 2897, post: 761957"] Yea its a mess. Mississippi State was apparently below the 53 player availability threshhold that would have let them postpone the game against Georgia, but they played anyway. (And nearly won.) Florida State was quoted as being concerned that since they were already a little thin due to their own covid/injury issues, that getting more spread potentially from Clemson would leave them unable to play in the next couple of weeks against Virginia and Duke. Note those games are significantly more winnable games than Clemson. You can read into that what you will. Now having said that, Clemson does hold fault here. We've been in this heavy testing regimen for a long time. You shouldn't be taking your pre-game tests so close that you can't get them back in time. And to that point, if I were a coach like Dabo and its time to get on the plane and you don't have a couple test results back yet - those guys can't travel (especially given this guy was a backup). Sucks, but IIWII. IMHO they got lazy assuming they would all be negative tests and let him/them travel anyway. To me, its a hole in the conference protocols if players without the required test results can still travel to games. That shouldn't even be a thing. I have no idea how that's even possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ACC Discussion 2020
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top