Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vespidae" data-source="post: 760108" data-attributes="member: 2957"><p>These are fun comparisons to make, but increasingly irrelevant. I understand why Tech went with the TO (academic issues, money issues) and also Geoff’s strategy (be close to the action while working your NIL rights).</p><p></p><p>The reality is this ... Tech has a break even athletic program, a small alumni base, and tough academic standards. We’re closer to Vandy than Clemson.</p><p></p><p>We have no massive merchandizing program, no organized fundraising clubs, and no massive booster base. We’re the Milwaukee Brewers of college sports ... competing at D1 ... efficiently... but not effectively.</p><p></p><p>We have a fabulous golf program. Which is indicative of where we are headed ... to those areas we can compete given the boat we are in.</p><p></p><p>I‘ve enjoyed watching a Tech football for 41 years. And we are right back where we were in 1980. Only worse. The coach can only do so much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vespidae, post: 760108, member: 2957"] These are fun comparisons to make, but increasingly irrelevant. I understand why Tech went with the TO (academic issues, money issues) and also Geoff’s strategy (be close to the action while working your NIL rights). The reality is this ... Tech has a break even athletic program, a small alumni base, and tough academic standards. We’re closer to Vandy than Clemson. We have no massive merchandizing program, no organized fundraising clubs, and no massive booster base. We’re the Milwaukee Brewers of college sports ... competing at D1 ... efficiently... but not effectively. We have a fabulous golf program. Which is indicative of where we are headed ... to those areas we can compete given the boat we are in. I‘ve enjoyed watching a Tech football for 41 years. And we are right back where we were in 1980. Only worse. The coach can only do so much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top