Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 759928" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>Soooo.... did you not read any of my post? Because comments like these are exactly what I was trying to address. Did you completely ignore the fact that Tech had the ball for almost an entire quarter longer than Clemson did in 2018? Yet they still allowed 49 points, <em>and </em>lost by 4 touchdowns?</p><p></p><p>In 2018 Clemson scored 49 points in 11 drives for a PPD average of 4.45. In 2020 Clemson scored 73 points in 17 drives for a PPD average of 4.29. Clemson had ZERO scoring drives of less than 50 yards in 2018, they had 4 in 2020. They had 3 drives where they scored 17 points while gaining only 15 combined yards.</p><p></p><p>In 2018 Clemson scored 49 points with a TOP of 23:55. That’s about 2.05 points per minute they had the ball. In 2020 Clemson scored 73 points with a TOP of 35:53. That’s about 2.03 points per minute with the ball. </p><p></p><p>Like I said, the defense played just as well, probably better, against Clemson in 2020 as they did in 2018. To say that 49 in 2018 is the same as 73 is definitely <em>not </em>ludicrous, it’s actually accurate. In fact, it’s so accurate that statistically the games were basically the same defensively. Now, if you want to provide some data other than anecdotal anger to disprove that point, I’d be happy to learn. Otherwise, you’ll have to accept the fact that 2018’s performance under CPJ was just as bad, and really worse, as 2020’s performance under CGC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 759928, member: 4572"] Soooo.... did you not read any of my post? Because comments like these are exactly what I was trying to address. Did you completely ignore the fact that Tech had the ball for almost an entire quarter longer than Clemson did in 2018? Yet they still allowed 49 points, [I]and [/I]lost by 4 touchdowns? In 2018 Clemson scored 49 points in 11 drives for a PPD average of 4.45. In 2020 Clemson scored 73 points in 17 drives for a PPD average of 4.29. Clemson had ZERO scoring drives of less than 50 yards in 2018, they had 4 in 2020. They had 3 drives where they scored 17 points while gaining only 15 combined yards. In 2018 Clemson scored 49 points with a TOP of 23:55. That’s about 2.05 points per minute they had the ball. In 2020 Clemson scored 73 points with a TOP of 35:53. That’s about 2.03 points per minute with the ball. Like I said, the defense played just as well, probably better, against Clemson in 2020 as they did in 2018. To say that 49 in 2018 is the same as 73 is definitely [I]not [/I]ludicrous, it’s actually accurate. In fact, it’s so accurate that statistically the games were basically the same defensively. Now, if you want to provide some data other than anecdotal anger to disprove that point, I’d be happy to learn. Otherwise, you’ll have to accept the fact that 2018’s performance under CPJ was just as bad, and really worse, as 2020’s performance under CGC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top