Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gtg936g" data-source="post: 758909" data-attributes="member: 623"><p>Or is it possible that the talent CPJ recruited fit his offense better than the NCAA offense that others ran? Take a look at linemen. Those shorter faster/smaller linemen didn’t get rated as high as the prototypical zone blocker that most people wanted, but that is exactly what we needed/wanted to run our scheme. I started my post with the acknowledgment that the people we recruit now fit the scheme we want to run. It also happens to fit what a lot of other teams want as well and the basis for star evaluation. So, yeah the recruiting star rankings should organically go up by a small margin just because we want what everyone else does and the basis of evaluation/rating is normalized now. I contend that this organic improvement is ineffective in measuring improvements in recruiting and the ability to succeed with this new talent we are obtaining because we are simply competing for the same talent and skill sets as everyone else. It is now critical to out recruit programs that we want to beat where before the basis for evaluation of talent by folks like rivals was less meaningful.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gtg936g, post: 758909, member: 623"] Or is it possible that the talent CPJ recruited fit his offense better than the NCAA offense that others ran? Take a look at linemen. Those shorter faster/smaller linemen didn’t get rated as high as the prototypical zone blocker that most people wanted, but that is exactly what we needed/wanted to run our scheme. I started my post with the acknowledgment that the people we recruit now fit the scheme we want to run. It also happens to fit what a lot of other teams want as well and the basis for star evaluation. So, yeah the recruiting star rankings should organically go up by a small margin just because we want what everyone else does and the basis of evaluation/rating is normalized now. I contend that this organic improvement is ineffective in measuring improvements in recruiting and the ability to succeed with this new talent we are obtaining because we are simply competing for the same talent and skill sets as everyone else. It is now critical to out recruit programs that we want to beat where before the basis for evaluation of talent by folks like rivals was less meaningful. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top