Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CuseJacket" data-source="post: 756502" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>I am sympathetic to this point of view. As you know the problem is there is no way to prove its validity, but I definitely acknowledge that resources matter.</p><p></p><p>As to our ability to compete with the haves and have-nots, I'll define "haves" as Clemson and Georgia of those regularly on our schedule. We stopped being competitive with both by 2017 (Clemson arguably sooner) and CPJ's offense couldn't compete, let alone our bad defense. So it's dubious as to which offensive system makes sense against those teams going forward unless there's a material shift.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, here are the last teams to beat Clemson and Georgia in the regular season since 2017 (that aren't in the "haves" group):</p><p>Clemson: Syracuse, Pittsburgh</p><p>Georgia: South Carolina</p><p></p><p>Takeaway: the offensive scheme advantage is moot based on those who beat the "haves", and in the case of Syracuse and Pittsburgh there is no material recruiting advantage compared to GT.</p><p></p><p>For the rest of our regular schedule, there isn't an insurmountable amount of separation. Miami, FSU and UNC will likely continue to out-recruit us. The remainder of the pecking order is up for grabs. That's been the case across the prior two regimes, save for maybe VT who was ahead of us during most of Gailey and part of the way thru Johnson.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CuseJacket, post: 756502, member: 274"] I am sympathetic to this point of view. As you know the problem is there is no way to prove its validity, but I definitely acknowledge that resources matter. As to our ability to compete with the haves and have-nots, I'll define "haves" as Clemson and Georgia of those regularly on our schedule. We stopped being competitive with both by 2017 (Clemson arguably sooner) and CPJ's offense couldn't compete, let alone our bad defense. So it's dubious as to which offensive system makes sense against those teams going forward unless there's a material shift. Furthermore, here are the last teams to beat Clemson and Georgia in the regular season since 2017 (that aren't in the "haves" group): Clemson: Syracuse, Pittsburgh Georgia: South Carolina Takeaway: the offensive scheme advantage is moot based on those who beat the "haves", and in the case of Syracuse and Pittsburgh there is no material recruiting advantage compared to GT. For the rest of our regular schedule, there isn't an insurmountable amount of separation. Miami, FSU and UNC will likely continue to out-recruit us. The remainder of the pecking order is up for grabs. That's been the case across the prior two regimes, save for maybe VT who was ahead of us during most of Gailey and part of the way thru Johnson. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
A Thread to Rehash GT HC Comparisons
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top