Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
77% of the starters for NFL Championships weren't 4 or 5 Stars
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tech_wreck47" data-source="post: 283200" data-attributes="member: 2346"><p>Not really, I would argue that more than 2 percent of college kids end up being 4 and 5 star players. NFL teams can't hold all of them. So let's say a 3 star turns out as a 4 star and the 4 star stays the same, the NFL has to pick one of them even though they are both 4 star quality players at that time so maybe they pick the kid that started as a 3 star. I have said this in another thread, just because the recruiting services label a kid a 2 or 3 star but they end up like a 4 or 5 star doesn't mean the services were wrong with their rankings at that time. For instance let's say a player is a 4 star and plays up to that level from the time he steps on campus then the services were right on him and let's say a 3 star steps on campus and by year 3 and 4 he plays at the same or a higher level than the original 4 star, where they wrong about the 3 star? No, because it took him 3 years to get to the point of a 4 star. So many people see kids turn out to be all stars that weren't highly ranked and automatically think the services were wrong when in reality that kid might have taken 3 years of college to get to that point with getting in a better strength program, better coaching, better practices against better players etc, I still considered the services to be right because at that time in high school he was only a 3 star. Bama, Clemson, FSU, Michigan, Ohio state are all teams that are where they are for a reason, so for anyone to say the services mean nothing are just talking crazy. Do they get it wrong? Sure, but I would assume they get it right more times than not for that current TIME. If a kid is super dominant at the high school level but not in college he was probably a 4 or 5 star coming out of high school but maybe he got with the wrong program or was lazy so people passed him up that still doesn't mean the services were wrong because when they rated him he was that 4 or 5 star.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tech_wreck47, post: 283200, member: 2346"] Not really, I would argue that more than 2 percent of college kids end up being 4 and 5 star players. NFL teams can't hold all of them. So let's say a 3 star turns out as a 4 star and the 4 star stays the same, the NFL has to pick one of them even though they are both 4 star quality players at that time so maybe they pick the kid that started as a 3 star. I have said this in another thread, just because the recruiting services label a kid a 2 or 3 star but they end up like a 4 or 5 star doesn't mean the services were wrong with their rankings at that time. For instance let's say a player is a 4 star and plays up to that level from the time he steps on campus then the services were right on him and let's say a 3 star steps on campus and by year 3 and 4 he plays at the same or a higher level than the original 4 star, where they wrong about the 3 star? No, because it took him 3 years to get to the point of a 4 star. So many people see kids turn out to be all stars that weren't highly ranked and automatically think the services were wrong when in reality that kid might have taken 3 years of college to get to that point with getting in a better strength program, better coaching, better practices against better players etc, I still considered the services to be right because at that time in high school he was only a 3 star. Bama, Clemson, FSU, Michigan, Ohio state are all teams that are where they are for a reason, so for anyone to say the services mean nothing are just talking crazy. Do they get it wrong? Sure, but I would assume they get it right more times than not for that current TIME. If a kid is super dominant at the high school level but not in college he was probably a 4 or 5 star coming out of high school but maybe he got with the wrong program or was lazy so people passed him up that still doesn't mean the services were wrong because when they rated him he was that 4 or 5 star. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
77% of the starters for NFL Championships weren't 4 or 5 Stars
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top